[WBEL-devel] Self Intro and some legal food for thought

[William Hooper]

Paul Iadonisi  said:
> On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 11:18, Tony wrote:
>> I could be wrong, but I was under the impression that there were a few
>> non GPL'd items in RH. Those would still fall under 'unable to use',
>
>   There doesn't appear to be anything more restrictive than in the
> original Red Hat Linux product line.  Certainly nothing proprietary or
> with less than OSI approved standards.

I believe the OP is refering to the components that are not
redistributable (I'm thinking IBM's Java at least).  It is my
understanding that these are included on a completely seperate CD.  Since
WBEL is based on the beta releases, this CD wasn't included.

-- 
William Hooper