[WBEL-devel] Availability of Whitebox Linux on 64bit processors

Milan Ker¹lįger milan.kerslager@pslib.cz
Thu, 1 Apr 2004 18:57:39 +0200


On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 11:30:27AM -0500, Paul Iadonisi wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 11:06, Milan Ker¹lįger wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > > Your not a liar ... you're an asshole.
> > 
> > Hope people underestand who are you.
> 
>   Hint: something along the lines of 'respect'.

The respect shuld be on both sides. There is no word about what RC1 for
AMD64 and IA64 is at Whitebox site. There is no word about the author
(Pasi Pirhonen). And Pasi waited about two months to see his hard work
at Whitebox site (even there was some messages about this in the list).
Maybe this is correct that they downloaded ISOs this way but I don't
think so.

I see no reason why not to tell that it is useless to use RC1 from
Whitebox site and I see no reason why not to tell that I have current
updates in my repository for AMD and that Whitebox site has none.

If you dislike this (and the sentence with suggestion to use Tao),
please blacklist me.

The WhiteBox is not the best same way like Tao, like RHEL and like
anything else (this is the reason we have multiple distributions). I use
Whitebox because I don't want to migrate to another-same distribution
only because I'm not satisfied with this or this. Instead of this I'm
trying to support YOU and write exactly what I see.

Maybe I'm wrong and you hate anybody who is able to write about what you
don't want to hear.

If you dislike the words 'nobody cares about AMD nad IA64 ports at
beau.org', I don't underestand why because this is the current
situation.

Anyway - this debate is totally off-topic and has nothing to do with
technical problems so I would be glad to close this thread as you have
nothing to tell except "I hate you because you told that noboby cares
about XY'.

-- 
                        Milan Kerslager
                        E-mail: milan.kerslager@pslib.cz
                        WWW:    http://www.pslib.cz/~kerslage/