[WBEL-devel] Heads up on RHEL Update2 Beta

[Tres Seaver]

Milan Keršláger wrote:

> There is no need to make 3.1 when Red Hat itself has none and 3.0 +
> updates is 3.1 then. Just respin ISOs like RH does (ok, as RH will do
> after final U2).

Right, except WBEL might do respins for different reasons, or at 
different times, than RHEL;  the choice should be based on trading off 
the pain of a respin versus the pain (and bandwidth) of old ISO + tons 
of updates.

> I see no real reson to maintain 5+ versions when all are the same
> (except installation ISOs). Who needs obsolete ISOs?
> 
> Just leave updates in same place and remove old ISOs. 

+1.  I suppose the original ISOs might be archived somewhere public, for 
curiosity's sake, but they don't need to be mirrored once newer ones are 
available.

Tres.
-- 
===============================================================
Tres Seaver                                tseaver@zope.com
Zope Corporation      "Zope Dealers"       http://www.zope.com