[WBEL-devel] Testers needed
Johnny Hughes
mailing-lists@hughesjr.com
Mon, 19 Apr 2004 06:24:41 -0500
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 03:05, Lance Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Greg Hosler wrote:
>
> >
> > On 18-Apr-2004 Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> > > I downloaded and installed all via:
> > >
> > > rpm -Uvh *
> > >
> > > I have tested cvs and openoffice.org.
> >
> > Did the openoffice.org rpm *really* upgrade ?
> >
> > I have RHEL3, and when I did the equivelent on RHEL3, the openoffice.org rpms
> > do NOT upgrade. The reason is simple. The package name is different from the
> > originally installed one. The original openoffice rpm is openoffice.#; the
> > errata is named openoffice.org-# -- as near as I can tell, rpm would *never*
> > consider openoffice.org as a candidate for openoffice, and as far as I can
> > see, that's why the rpm -Fvh that I did, did not update the original
> > openoffice's rpms.
>
> rpm -Fvh doesnt
>
> >
> > So... I'm curious. did your openoffice.org rpm really update ?
>
> rpm -Uvh does work
>
I have indeed verified that I only have openoffice.org and not
openoffice rpms ... and that:
rpm -Uvh
does do the upgrade correctly
all my shortcuts still work as well ...
> similarily with yum - yum update wont pick it up - but 'yum upgrade
> openoffice' will.
>
> Lance
- Johnny Hughes