[WBEL-devel] Choosing a RHEL rebuild project
Henk van Lingen
henkvl@cs.uu.nl
Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:52:11 +0100
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:45:24PM -0500, Hedemark, Magnus wrote:
> CentOS does have a number of builds out there. Build 4 is the current
> build. Regardless of whether you call it a stable release or a beta or
> whatever, the fact of the matter is it was at least as "stable" as the
> "stable" release of WBEL. I have had both running side by side on a number
> of production desktop systems at $WORK and they are both rough around the
> edges to pretty much the same extent. CentOS has just been more cautious
> about labeling their 1.0 release until the rough edges have been smoothed.
Hi Magnus,
One more question, although it may become off-topic here (but #caos and
centos-devel list seems really quiet).
Build 4 is around a month. What are the things being 'rough around the
edges' in the various rebuilds? I suppose mostly artwork, remains of
RedHat trademarks and installer things? I have the, probably
oversimplified, impression that since we are taking about clones here
there is not much to do anymore once a build environment/scripts has
been set up. From there it is just building all the RH SRPMs, right?
Additionally, I'm I right in thinking that upgrading a running system
from build 4 to final once it arrives is simple, i.e. just updating a
couple of rpms?
Regards,
--
Henk van Lingen, Systems & Network Administrator (o- -+
Dept. of Computer Science, Utrecht University. /\ |
phone: +31-30-2535278 v_/_
http://henk.vanlingen.net/ http://www.tuxtown.net/netiquette/