[WBEL-devel] Newest rhn-applet and whitebox-release errata
John Morris
jmorris@beau.org
Sat, 12 Jun 2004 01:51:29 -0500 (CDT)
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, William Hooper wrote:
> The whitebox-release-3WB_i386-1.i386.rpm also breaks yum, because it
> makes $releasever="3WB_i386". Without seeing your new spec, is it safe
> to assume that whitebox-release-3WB-3.0-4_i386.rpm will mean
> $releasever="3.0" again?
Hmm.. Ok, looks like I dropped the 3ES|3AS|3WS part originally and should
do so again. I think RH's idea of encoding arch into a version number is
lame (pop quiz, is redhat-release-3AS-12.2.src.rpm the i386, x86_64 or ppc
package?) so how about this scheme:
whitebox-release-${releasever}-${subversion}_${arch}.src.rpm which builds
whitebox-release-${releasever}-${subversion}_${arch}.${arch}.rpm
For this respin: whitebox-release-3.0-4_i386.i386.rpm
and whitebox-release-3.0-4_x86_64.x86_64.rpm
That should make everything work again.
So consider this last call for bugs. Barring any last minute bug reports
here is the schedule.
Sat/Sun: I will fix these two bugs and put the packages in the main repo.
Then I will install a fresh 3.0 and let up2date bring it current and make
sure everything works. Then I'll spin new images, blow the test box off,
reload 3.0 and upgrade via anaconda.
Mon: Populate the primary and wait for the mirrors to catch up.
Wed: Formal announcement to whitebox-announce, distrowatch, freshmeat,
etc.
--
John M. http://www.beau.org/~jmorris This post is 100% M$ Free!
Geekcode 3.1:GCS C+++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ W++ w--- Y++ b++ 5+++ R tv- e* r