[WBEL-devel] Newest rhn-applet and whitebox-release errata

Johnny Hughes mailing-lists@hughesjr.com
Sun, 20 Jun 2004 13:45:15 -0500


--=-Xeztjh1vqJOcYkFpqYZt
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 02:02, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:02:12PM -0500, John Morris wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> > 
> > > whitebox-release 3.0-4_i386.i386 is missing /etc/redhat-release. Is
> > > that intentional?
> > 
> > Nope, tis a bug.  So one last respin......  :)
> 
> Just installed whitebox-release 3.0-5_i386.i386 and it's still missing
> the /etc/redhat-release. Maybe you need one more final last spin? :)
> 
> # rpm -q whitebox-release
> whitebox-release-3.0-5_i386
> # ls -ld /etc/redhat-release
> ls: /etc/redhat-release: No such file or directory
> 

Besides changing redhat-release to whitebox-release in every spec file
... what is the work around for this when compiling SRPMS?

-Johnny Hughes

--=-Xeztjh1vqJOcYkFpqYZt
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
  <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
  <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.0.9">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 02:02, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE><FONT COLOR="#737373"><I>On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:02:12PM -0500, John Morris wrote:
&gt; On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
&gt; 
&gt; &gt; whitebox-release 3.0-4_i386.i386 is missing /etc/redhat-release. Is
&gt; &gt; that intentional?
&gt; 
&gt; Nope, tis a bug.  So one last respin......  :)

Just installed whitebox-release 3.0-5_i386.i386 and it's still missing
the /etc/redhat-release. Maybe you need one more final last spin? :)

# rpm -q whitebox-release
whitebox-release-3.0-5_i386
# ls -ld /etc/redhat-release
ls: /etc/redhat-release: No such file or directory
</I></FONT></PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
Besides changing redhat-release to whitebox-release in every spec file ... what is the work around for this when compiling SRPMS?<BR>
<BR>
-Johnny Hughes
</BODY>
</HTML>

--=-Xeztjh1vqJOcYkFpqYZt--