[WBEL-users] Improved and Nicer version of Red hat enterprise
Vincent.Raffensberger@dtn.com
Vincent.Raffensberger@dtn.com
Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:18:53 -0500
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 004EB79186256E83_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
I suspect you are right. The address for eadem.com (dynamic dns) is in
the same address block as the thread starter's email domain (colba.net).
"Manley, Johnny" <JManley@miswaco.com>
Sent by: whitebox-users-admin@beau.org
04/27/2004 07:22 AM
To
whitebox-users@beau.org
cc
Subject
RE: [WBEL-users] Improved and Nicer version of Red hat enterprise
I suspect this was a marketing drive-by...
-----Original Message-----
From: whitebox-users-admin@beau.org
[mailto:whitebox-users-admin@beau.org] On Behalf Of Jan-Albert van Ree
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 11:35 AM
To: whitebox-users@beau.org
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] Improved and Nicer version of Red hat
enterprise
On Sunday 25 April 2004 09:51, alex66@colba.net wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I found a better version of redhat enterprise 3. It's really compact.
No
> gnome , no kde just blackbox. If you have a good knwoledge of linux
> (Terminal), this version is for you. Fast and nice looking version
called
> Eadem. For those interested you can downlad the images at
www.eadem.com.
With all respect, but why does the fact that it's smaller and perhaps
leaner
automatically mean it's better? People do use GNOME, KDE or other
software
you might not find useful.
Besides, it was the goal of Whitebox to be as similair to RHEL as
possible,
which is perhaps it's greatest strength. So why compare them in such a
negative way?
--
Jan-Albert van Ree | http://www.vanree.net/brickpiles/
VanReeDotNet IT Solutions | http://www.vanree.net
GnuPG key |
http://www.vanree.net/~javanree/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
Whitebox-users mailing list
Whitebox-users@beau.org
http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
______________________________________________________________________________
This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
Copying, forwarding or distributing this message by persons or entities
other than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this email in
error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from
any computer. This email may have been monitored for policy compliance.
[021216]
_______________________________________________
Whitebox-users mailing list
Whitebox-users@beau.org
http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
--=_alternative 004EB79186256E83_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">I suspect you are right. The address
for eadem.com (dynamic dns) is in the same address block as the thread
starter's email domain (colba.net).</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td width=40%><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>"Manley, Johnny"
<JManley@miswaco.com></b> </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: whitebox-users-admin@beau.org</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">04/27/2004 07:22 AM</font>
<td width=59%>
<table width=100%>
<tr>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td valign=top><font size=1 face="sans-serif">whitebox-users@beau.org</font>
<tr>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td valign=top>
<tr>
<td>
<div align=right><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td valign=top><font size=1 face="sans-serif">RE: [WBEL-users] Improved
and Nicer version of Red hat enterprise</font></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>I suspect this was a marketing drive-by...<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: whitebox-users-admin@beau.org<br>
[mailto:whitebox-users-admin@beau.org] On Behalf Of Jan-Albert van Ree<br>
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 11:35 AM<br>
To: whitebox-users@beau.org<br>
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] Improved and Nicer version of Red hat<br>
enterprise<br>
<br>
On Sunday 25 April 2004 09:51, alex66@colba.net wrote:<br>
> Hi folks,<br>
><br>
> I found a better version of redhat enterprise 3. It's really compact.<br>
No<br>
> gnome , no kde just blackbox. If you have a good knwoledge of linux<br>
> (Terminal), this version is for you. Fast and nice looking version<br>
called<br>
> Eadem. For those interested you can downlad the images at<br>
www.eadem.com.<br>
<br>
With all respect, but why does the fact that it's smaller and perhaps<br>
leaner <br>
automatically mean it's better? People do use GNOME, KDE or other<br>
software <br>
you might not find useful.<br>
<br>
Besides, it was the goal of Whitebox to be as similair to RHEL as<br>
possible, <br>
which is perhaps it's greatest strength. So why compare them in such a
<br>
negative way?<br>
-- <br>
Jan-Albert van Ree | http://www.vanree.net/brickpiles/<br>
VanReeDotNet IT Solutions | http://www.vanree.net<br>
GnuPG key |<br>
http://www.vanree.net/~javanree/publickey.asc<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Whitebox-users mailing list<br>
Whitebox-users@beau.org<br>
http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________________________________________________________<br>
This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Copying,
forwarding or distributing this message by persons or entities other than
the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any
computer. This email may have been monitored for policy compliance.
[021216]<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Whitebox-users mailing list<br>
Whitebox-users@beau.org<br>
http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users<br>
</tt></font>
<br>
--=_alternative 004EB79186256E83_=--