[WBEL-users] WBEL Vs Centos ? :-S

[Greg Knaddison]

On Tue, 07 Dec 2004 12:20:33 -0500, Timothy Nash <tnash1@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
>  Craig White wrote:
>  
> 
> 
>  On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 17:51 +0200, Raimo Koski wrote: 
>  Update 3 based respin of Lineox has been available for free now for two
> months. Comparable WBEL just doesn't exist yet. If you want yet faster
> availability you can always pay to Red Hat. TANSTAAFL. ---- maybe it's me
> but it just seems rude to frequently post recruiting messages here. Craig
> _______________________________________________ Whitebox-users mailing list
> Whitebox-users@beau.org http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users Not
> only rude, but unprofessional as well......  Raimo, I hope you realize that
> what you write (in these forums) is a direct reflection of your character. 
> While I have no problem with you promoting lineox (mind you not over and
> over and over....), I do have a problem with the way in which you bash the
> other clones.  Your character in and of itself is enough to make me not use
> Lineox, regardless of it's merits.  As others have pointed out in this
> forum, speedy updates is NOT the sole criterion for choosing a cloned
> distro.  One thing that WBEL has that the other distros do not is THIS forum
> - one of the best community forums which I've had the pleasure of being  a
> part of.
>  

What's funny to me is that I wrote to Raimo directly about half way
into this thread and asked him to stop posting because I wasn't
interested in hearing it and clealry others weren't either.  Blah blah
freedom of speech, censorship, he can do what he wants, but it's RUDE.
 Now...where is the Lineox forum for me to advertise WBEL and CentOS
and Tao and...

Oh...there it is.  How interesting that there is virtually no traffic
on those lists.

Greg