[WBEL-users] Problemas patching qmail

[Bastiaan van der Put]

http://www.qmail.org/moni.csi.hu/pub/glibc-2.3.1/qmail-1.03.errno.patch
At 19:02 5/13/2004, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Can you tell me please the URL from where you've downloaded the patch ?
>
>Warm Regards,
>Mário Gamito
>
>On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 17:35, Bastiaan van der Put wrote:
> > patch applies without problems,
> >
> > so like i said probably a bad download.
> >
> > greetings,
> >
> > Bas
> >
> > At 18:08 5/12/2004, you wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I'm using the 1.03 origina by djb.
> > >
> > >Reagards,
> > >Mário Gamito
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: whitebox-users-admin@beau.org
> > > > [mailto:whitebox-users-admin@beau.org] On Behalf Of Bastiaan
> > > > van der Put
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 4:13 PM
> > > > To: whitebox-users@beau.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] Problemas patching qmail
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Which qmail did you use? original 1.03 or netqmail.
> > > >
> > > > netqmail compiles fine(includes patch).
> > > >
> > > > But it seems the patch is corrupted, bad download orso.
> > > >
> > > > Greetings,
> > > > Bas
> > > > At 09:43 5/12/2004, you wrote:
> > > > >Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > >Yesterday i was installing qmail in wihtebox Linux for the
> > > > first time.
> > > > >When i applied the qmail-errno.patch (taken from qmail.org)
> > > > because of
> > > > >glibc version, i got this message saying that the patch terminated
> > > > >abruptedly at the middle of the file.
> > > > >
> > > > >Never the less, the compilation ran smoothly.
> > > > >But afterwards, i had a lot of troubles getting qmail to work that i
> > > > >never have had before: the daemons didn't worked, same thing for the
> > > > >logs, and a lot of defunct supervise processes, and locked files.
> > > > >
> > > > >I have years of experience with qmail, so i've rechecked the
> > > > >installation over and over very carefuly, but it was well made.
> > > > >
> > > > >Does anyone knows of such an issue with this patch, qmail
> > > > and whitebox ?
> > > > >Is there another patch that suits the best for whitebox ?
> > > > >
> > > > >Warm Regards,
> > > > >Mário Gamito
> > > > >
> > > > >_______________________________________________
> > > > >Whitebox-users mailing list
> > > > >Whitebox-users@beau.org
> > > > >http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Whitebox-users mailing list
> > > > Whitebox-users@beau.org
> > > > http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Whitebox-users mailing list
> > >Whitebox-users@beau.org
> > >http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Whitebox-users mailing list
> > Whitebox-users@beau.org
> > http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
>
>_______________________________________________
>Whitebox-users mailing list
>Whitebox-users@beau.org
>http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users