Michael Falzon wrote: > Hi > > >>/What are the symptoms exactly? >>/ >> > OK with 2.4.26 X she boots X11 load logon and X dies with this > this is for the x logs > > GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 135 (): error 'No such > process' during 'pthread_getschedparam (pthread_self(), &policy, &sched)' > aborting... > the problem is that your self-compiled 2.4.26 kernel has no TLS support (the vanilla 2.4 series simply does not have it), whereas the RedHat kernels have it. Remedy: remove or rename the directory /lib/tls - this will make X (and other stuff) work nicely. Also, keep in mind that whenever you update glibc you need to take care of /lib/tls . In case you have a Nvidia card and use the NVIDIA driver, you must install it with --force-tls=classic Basically, the problem is a FAQ on this list. Kay
|
See BUG. "That's not a bug, it's a feature!" A bug can be changed to a feature by documenting it. Michael Falzon (RHCT) Mozy's Swamp BBs & Red Dwarf BBs http://mozysswamp.org Registered LFS User #406 Registered Linux User #204397 |
Dear All,
Need some expert guidance from all of you … =
=3DP
I’ve been looking for docs regarding postfix + =
ldap setup but
unfortunately<=
/span> the docs at
postfix.org is old and not updated.
Can you share some of your sites regarding config and setup
on postfix + ldap?
Thank you very much,
Marc
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004
| "Jon" <jjma100@yahoo.co.uk>
Sent by: whitebox-users-admin@beau.org 11/05/2004 06:50 AM |
|
Michael Falzon wrote: > FAQ of WB ? can see it ? > someone should write it! But your particular problem is a RHEL one, and not specific for WBEL. Kay
|
See BUG. "That's not a bug, it's a feature!" A bug can be changed to a feature by documenting it. Michael Falzon (RHCT) Mozy's Swamp BBs & Red Dwarf BBs http://mozysswamp.org Registered LFS User #406 Registered Linux User #204397 |
On Tue, 2004-11-09 at 10:30 -0500, Joe Aldeguer wrote:--=====================_159466233==_.ALT-- From reblair@operamail.com Wed Nov 10 12:00:30 2004 From: reblair@operamail.com (Robert E. Blair ) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:00:30 +0100 Subject: [WBEL-users] Install on AMD64, no network connectivity Message-ID: <20041110120030.B6777398198@ws5-1.us4.outblaze.com> I can speak with authority that a realtek 8169 does work in at least one amd64 system with a 2.6 kernel. I too had problems with the release kernels mainly (I'm speculating) because you need to disable acpi for them to work at all. I might add that the 8169 gets 100Mbps performance unless you use the newer realtek drivers (v2.2) from their website. seth wrote: I have just installed WHEL3 on an AMD64 3400+, and I am having a dickens of a problem getting the network up and going... I have tried the built in Realtek 8169, a Realtek 8139 and two 3Com cards.... I can't get the built in NIC to detect, no biggie....all of the PCI network cards I tried have the same effect....the card is dectected without errors, the link light comes on....but I can't ping anything except the local IP of the NIC. I have tried different cables and two different ports on the switch. I am a Network Engineer so I have tried all of the basic troubleshooting. Can someone point me in the right direction, I can't help but feel it has something to do with either the WBEL3 AMD64 build or a related caveat... Thanks, Doug Eubanks admin@dougware.net What Motherboard are you using and what is the chipset listed in its manual? Seth Bardash Integrated Solutions and Systems http://www.integratedsolutions.org Supplier of AMD, Intel and SPARC Servers and Systems running Windows, Linux, Solaris and VxWorks. *Failure can not cope with perseverance* -- _____________________________________________________________ Web-based SMS services available at http://www.operamail.com. >From your mailbox to local or overseas cell phones. Powered by Outblaze From jean.lee@free.fr Wed Nov 10 14:44:44 2004 From: jean.lee@free.fr (Jean Lee) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 15:44:44 +0100 Subject: [WBEL-users] How to uninstall an rpm package which has dependencies? In-Reply-To: <419111B3.3000909@platypus.bc.ca> References: <41908458.2020606@free.fr> <4190D602.90708@swbell.net> <4191014C.4080801@free.fr> <419109BD.3040806@free.fr> <419111B3.3000909@platypus.bc.ca> Message-ID: <4192295C.7080506@free.fr> Hi bishop, OK I tried your rpms. The installation is OK and I succeed to create a jail which works for ssh. I follow the manual which is available here : http://www.netadmintools.com/art294.html The problem is that it doesn't work with sftp-server. During the creation of the chroot environnement, I made a copy of /usr/libexec/openssh/sftp-server to "path-to-chroot"/./usr/libexec/openssh/sftp-server then : cd "path-to-chroot"/./usr/libexec/openssh/ ldd sftp-server The output gives some libraries which I copied into the correct folders. When I tried : sftp jean@ServeurLinux I am asked for a password and then I have an error saying me that a library related to kerberos is not found. I verified and this library is at the place which is telled by ldd (+the "path-to-chroot")...... It is related to this kerberos library because I tried to supress libz.so.1 (which is also needed by sftp-server) and the error message was then that it didn't find libz.so.1. I suppose so than when this library is well placed, sftp-server can find it. Do you have any idea why sftp-server doesn't find this kerberos library ? Thank you for your support. Jean bishop wrote: > > Hey Jean, > > The SRPM (Source RPM) contains the necessary code to build RPMs. It's > really just a cpio of the tar.gz, some diffs and a build script (.spec). > > Building the RPMs is done with > rpm -i openssh.src.rpm > rpmbuild -ba openssh.spec > > Here's the current patch for the spec file to integrate the chroot diff: > >> --- /home/bishop/RPM/SPECS/openssh.spec~ 2004-11-09 >> 03:35:49.000000000 -0800 >> +++ /home/bishop/RPM/SPECS/openssh.spec 2004-11-09 10:15:59.000000000 >> -0800 >> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ >> %if %{rescue} >> Release: %{rel}rescue >> %else >> -Release: %{rel} >> +Release: %{rel}%{?_with_chroot:chroot} >> %endif >> URL: http://www.openssh.com/portable.html >> Source0: >> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/openssh-%{version}.tar.gz >> >> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ >> Patch4: openssh-3.9p1-skip-initial.patch >> Patch11: >> http://www.sxw.org.uk/computing/patches/openssh-3.6.1p2-gssapi-20030430.diff >> >> Patch12: openssh-selinux.patch >> +Patch15: >> http://chrootssh.sourceforge.net/download/osshChroot-3.6.1.diff >> License: BSD >> Group: Applications/Internet >> BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-buildroot >> @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ >> %if ! %{build6x} >> Requires: /etc/pam.d/system-auth >> %endif >> +%{?_with_chroot:Provides: ssh-server-chroot} >> >> %package askpass >> Summary: A passphrase dialog for OpenSSH and X. >> @@ -226,6 +227,10 @@ >> %patch12 -p1 -b .selinux >> %endif >> >> +%if %{?_with_chroot:1}%{?!_with_chroot:0}%{?commentish:These >> constructs suck} >> +%patch15 -p1 -b .chroot >> +%endif >> + >> %build >> CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"; export CFLAGS >> %if %{rescue} > > > (yes, I hate line 89 too) > > Okay, I'm in my meeting now, so I can't test/examine the RPMs at all, > but if you want to test something, grab these: > >> Wrote: >> /home/bishop/public_html/apt/i386/wb30/SRPMS.extras/openssh-3.9p1-1chroot.src.rpm >> >> Wrote: >> /home/bishop/public_html/apt/i386/wb30/RPMS.extras/openssh-3.9p1-1chroot.i386.rpm >> >> Wrote: >> /home/bishop/public_html/apt/i386/wb30/RPMS.extras/openssh-clients-3.9p1-1chroot.i386.rpm >> >> Wrote: >> /home/bishop/public_html/apt/i386/wb30/RPMS.extras/openssh-server-3.9p1-1chroot.i386.rpm >> >> Wrote: >> /home/bishop/public_html/apt/i386/wb30/RPMS.extras/openssh-askpass-3.9p1-1chroot.i386.rpm >> >> Wrote: >> /home/bishop/public_html/apt/i386/wb30/RPMS.extras/openssh-askpass-gnome-3.9p1-1chroot.i386.rpm >> > > > They may work. I have them here (but get the right ones!) : > > http://apt.platypus.bc.ca/~bis hop/apt/i386/wb30/RPMS.extras/ > http://apt.platypus.bc.ca/~bis hop/apt/i386/wb30/SRPMS.extras/ > > I'll examine the RPM later today, as I mentioned. > > To examine all the changes I've made to the SRPMS: > install one SRPM > move the dirname away (`mv RPM{,1}`) > install the other SRPM > compare them: > diff -uNr --exclude-from=openssh3.*gz RPM{1,} > > I can send these diffs to you if you are interested. > > - bish > > Jean Lee wrote: > >> Well, I really made something wrong. >> >> I was on the openssh website and didn't find the tar.gz files for >> openssh-client, openssh-server, openssh-askpass and >> openssh-askpass-gnome. :) sorry, I'm a newbie. >> Bishop, how did you do to produce these files ? Is it something with >> this srpms file? >> If the rpm files are produced by the srpms one. How can I apply a >> patch to the tar.gz file and then create the srpms file from this >> patched tar.gz file and then finally obtain my rpm files? >> >> What do I have installed (Installation explained in my previous mail)? >> >> Thank you for your answers because I think that I'm a bit lost. >> >> Jean >> >> Jean Lee wrote: >> >>> Thank to all of you for your great help. >>> This mail is just to give a back and keep a trace, >>> >>> I have created an rpm of the patched openssh >>> (openssh-3.9p1-chroot.tar.gz) with the checkinstall binary. I called >>> it openssh-3.9p1-1.i386.rpm and checkinstall automatically installed >>> it. >>> I didn't do a 'yum remove openssh-3.6.1p2' because I didn't want to >>> brake some dependencies. >>> >>> When I type 'rpm -q openssh', I have a good return : openssh-3.9p1-1 >>> but if I try to erase it 'rpm -e openssh', I have the following >>> return : >>> >>> error: Failed dependencies : >>> openssh = 3.6.1p2-33.30.1 is needed by (installed) >>> openssh-askpass-3.6.1p2-33.30.1 >>> openssh = 3.6.1p2-33.30.1 is needed by (installed) >>> openssh-askpass-gnome-3.6.1p2-33.30.1 >>> openssh = 3.6.1p2-33.30.1 is needed by (installed) >>> openssh-client-3.6.1p2-33.30.1 >>> openssh = 3.6.1p2-33.30.1 is needed by (installed) >>> openssh-server-3.6.1p2-33.30.1 >>> >>> Another thing : If I type 'whereis sshd', the return is : >>> /usr/sbin/sshd and /usr/local/sbin/sshd . >>> It doesn't seem to be very good.. >>> >>> I will try now to upgrade these 4 tools with standard openssh-3.9p1 >>> and see what will come..... >>> >>> Jean >>> >>> Randy Kelsoe wrote: >>> >>>> Jean Lee wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> I think that what I want is not so hard but I really don't know >>>>> how to do it. >>>>> >>>>> My problem is that I want to unintsall openssh-3.6.1p2 which is >>>>> installed as an rpm package and then install openssh-3.9p1-chroot >>>>> which is a tarball (it is a patched version of Openssh-3.9p1 with >>>>> added chroot functionnality). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> As I suggested in a previous thread of yours, get the checkinstall >>>> package and install it. Then you can untar the openssh-3.9p1-chroot >>>> package, do your './configure', then 'make' and then instead of >>>> doing your normal 'make install', run 'checkinstall' which will >>>> create and install an RPM package for you. That way, if you have >>>> problems with the new package, you can remove it with the 'rpm -e' >>>> command. When you need to upgrade the package, it will be a lot >>>> easier to let rpm do the upgrade and keep track of the files. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well, I tried first to uninstall openssh-3.6.1p2 with : >>>>> rpm -e openssh >>>>> and this command failed due to dependencies to other packages : >>>>> openssh-server, openssh-client, netdump and a few others related >>>>> to openssh... >>>>> >>>>> I'm sure that I am doing something wrong. Perhaps that I can >>>>> firstly uninstall the packages related to openssh but the one with >>>>> netdump is probably not recommended.. Moreover, I tried to >>>>> uninstall openssh-server and it failed due to a dependency to >>>>> netdump-server. >>>>> >>>>> What is the right way? Do I have really to uninstall every package >>>>> which has a dependency before uninstalling openssh or is there >>>>> another way which ensure that nothing will be broken? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> In your case, I would recommend trying the checkinstall method >>>> above first. If you really want to get rid of the dependencies, you >>>> can rpm -e more than one package at a time: >>>> >>>> rpm -e openssh openssh-server openssh-client netdump >>>> >>>> yum is also handy for this: >>>> >>>> yum remove packagename >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for any help, >>>>> >>>>> Jean >>>> > > From jim@well.com Wed Nov 10 15:50:25 2004 From: jim@well.com (jim stockford) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:50:25 -0800 Subject: [WBEL-users] thanks for vsftpd responses Message-ID: <3D08A6F4-3330-11D9-B0CA-000A95EA5592@well.com> Thanks for vsftpd responses: I've discovered scp, which uses sshd, requires login, but it's encrypted, not plaintext. As i don't need anonymous ftp, scp is a suitable alternative that does the job. From jim@well.com Wed Nov 10 15:50:59 2004 From: jim@well.com (jim stockford) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:50:59 -0800 Subject: [WBEL-users] dvd burner drivers Message-ID: <510929FC-3330-11D9-B0CA-000A95EA5592@well.com> --Apple-Mail-34--611908364 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed I'm thinking of getting either Sony DW-D18A 8X DVDRW=A0=A0=A01=A099=A0=A0 Lite-On SHOW-1633S 16X DVDRW=A0=A01=A0109=A0=A0 NEC 16X DVD+/-RW DUAL LAYER=A0=A01=A0109=A0=A0 but I'm worried that I won't have a driver that works them. Anybody know of Linux DVD drivers? Also, I've got a stand-along LiteOn DVD burner, anyone know the right driver for that? The purpose is not videos but data backup. I'm just looking for a bigger, better CD jim --Apple-Mail-34--611908364 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm thinking of getting either=20 =
> I'm mulling over the idea of replacing my Microsoft Windows
> 2000 server Active Directory with Samba. I'm tired of dealing
> with expensive server, client licenses. I am already using White
> Box 3.0 ES for our internal website, proxy server, SMTP, Webmail.
> The ease of using roaming profile using MS AD is the only thing
> holding me back.
>
> Have you been successful implemeting roaming profiles using Samba
> and what are the pit falls? Most of my users use Win2k Pro and XP.
>
> Any thoughts suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you!
>
> Regards,
>
> Joe
My understanding with the current version of samba is that it can not be
a Windows 2000 ADS domain controller ... only as an NT 4 type PDC / BDC.
Anyone know of a way to make a samba machine be a Windows 2000 ADS
domain controller?
Using NT4 roaming profiles is not hard ... and my WhiteBox samba PDC
guide does do it:
http://www.hughesjr.com/content/view/24/2/Site_News
So if a NT4 type domain is OK, then using samba will work.
If someone knows how to use samba as a Win2000 ADS domain controller,
please post links :)
--
Johnny Hughes
<http://www.HughesJR.com/>
_______________________________________________
Whitebox-users mailing list
Whitebox-users@beau.org
http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
|
See BUG. "That's not a bug, it's a feature!" A bug can be changed to a feature by documenting it. Michael Falzon (RHCT) Mozy's Swamp BBs & Red Dwarf BBs http://mozysswamp.org Registered LFS User #406 Registered Linux User #204397 |
Well, at least, we got a review in NewsForge! http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=04/11/08/1719212 I can see the Beauregard Library traffic is going to hurt! _______________________________________________ Whitebox-users mailing list Whitebox-users@beau.org http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
|
See BUG. "That's not a bug, it's a feature!" A bug can be changed to a feature by documenting it. Michael Falzon (RHCT) Mozy's Swamp BBs & Red Dwarf BBs http://mozysswamp.org Registered LFS User #406 Registered Linux User #204397 |
Hello,
I recently setup a Whitebox server with Webmin. While performing the YUM update to install all new packages/updates my internet connection apparently got interrupted. As a result the updates did not complete. Is there a way I can force the update to either start over or complete?
The server is now in a data center (I didn't notice the problem at first), so being able to do this remotely would be very helpful. Otherwise a trip down there would be required.
Thanks for any help/pointers on how to fix this.
Dale
From michiele@info.nl Thu Nov 11 16:03:50 2004 From: michiele@info.nl (Michiel van Es) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:03:50 +0100 Subject: [WBEL-users] upgrade with yum or apt from red hat 9.0 to whitebox linux Message-ID: <41938D66.3080306@info.nl> Hi, is this possible and if not why is it possible with CentOS en Lineox (other RHEL clones) and not with WhiteBox? Some people like Fedora over Whitebox 'cause of the yum upgrade possibility to update all you red hat 9.0 servers to Fedora Core 2/3. has anyone already did a succesful upgrade with yum/apt to whitebox? We want to do this for our remote servers. Thanks in advance. -- Kind Regards, Michiel From kbohling@birddog.com Thu Nov 11 16:36:05 2004 From: kbohling@birddog.com (Kirby C. Bohling) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:36:05 -0600 Subject: [WBEL-users] ROOTKIT checking software In-Reply-To: <000801c4c7dd$a1a213b0$4100a8c0@Laptop> References: <000801c4c7dd$a1a213b0$4100a8c0@Laptop> Message-ID: <20041111163557.GA10677@hawk.birddog.com> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 10:53:55AM -0000, Denis Croombs wrote: > I have just taken over admin for approx 20 Linux systems (RH9.0) and need > to check that they have not been rootkit'd (for my own piece of mind) > anybody had experience of good toolkits for finding out of a system has > been compromised ? > It's not exactly what you asked for. However, this might be useful to you. I've used the techniques described below to check out machines I just took over. Sorry if this all obvious to you. I sure wish somebody had pointed it out to me earlier in my admin experience. > That is before I prepare a plan to change them to Whitebox over the coming > weeks/months. If you have a known copy of the RPM database, you can use commands like this (or you can probably build one with the original packages if use the --justdb option and change the rpmdb path, you can build a RPM db for the packages you believe should be installed on the machine): Boot off a known clean disk image, mount the disks you want to check: $ for foo in `rpm -q -a` ; do rpm -V --nomd5 $foo ; done $ find / -type f \! -exec rpm --quiet -q -f {} \; -print You'll need to modify them to --root and use the --redhatprovides to do the job. You'll probably want to remove the --nomd5 from the options also to be more secure. I've used the two above commands to find absolutely every file on a machine that isn't the same as what came out of an RPM. I trusted the RPM database on the machine. If you don't, you'll have to do like I said and add the --root and --redhatprovides options for RPM. It's a poor mans way of running/simulating tripwire after the fact. The one serious issue with this is that you might have to replace the initrd images on /boot to be absolutely sure everything is clean (I believe those are built by a script, not installed from the RPM, thus I don't believe they are in the database, if they are you shouldn't trust them anyways, they are good place for a rootkit to attack to get access to the machine early in the boot cycle). As long as I'm making the list, this is a good command to see what packages have been updated/installed since the machine was installed: rpm -q -a --queryformat "%{INSTALLTIME:date} %{NAME}\n" Load that into a spreadsheet and sort by the date. There should be a fairly obvious break in the times, that's probably the last package that got installed on the original install. In the end, when I take over a box, I've found these to be useful to find everything on the machine that isn't stock. It's a quick and relatively painless way to find out what sorts of things I need to look out for. Thanks, Kirby From kodak@frontierhomemortgage.com Thu Nov 11 16:53:49 2004 From: kodak@frontierhomemortgage.com (Jason Balicki) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:53:49 -0600 Subject: [WBEL-users] Enterprise Managment Suggestions In-Reply-To: <001401c4c7fc$99093520$0a00a8c0@wonderland> Message-ID: <005101c4c80f$04305ec0$0501a8c0@darkside> Tony <> wrote: > Sorry if this is a tad OT, but does anyone have suggestions for > 'enterprise management' tools? What type of management? There are all kinds of tools out there (many half-finished, but I digress) to help you manage machines of all types. There's patch management, network management, server management, user management, antivirus management, resource accounting (printers, etc.,) fried shrimp, shrimp gumbo, asset management, backup management and more; not to mention the Windows & Linux variations of all of these. For the record, I use a multitude of tools. Here's a short list off of the top of my head: 1) Scripts. Scripts. Scripts. For a lot of things. For example, I use a relatively simple script to retrieve anti-virus logs off of my workstations and sort through them for errors, warnings and virus reports. I have another that performs auxiliary backups to firewire hard drives connected to my backup server. There are many, many more. You can't beat the portability and tweakability of shell or perl scripts for quick and dirty tasks that turn into long term solutions. 2) ntop. Get good stats on your servers. 3) Avalon. Ditto, but different. 4) Vendor tools. For example, my phone system comes with an "enterprise class" web based administration tool. What I can't figure out is why some vendors believe "enterprise class" means "make it with a bad UI and make it with Java". 5) snmp/mrtg/rrdtool. Sort of falls in the "scripts" category but has a special place in my heart. Every network device you own probably has SNMP capabilities. If it doesn't, you're using the wrong network device. :) You can use mrtg or rrdtool (with supporting software) to report stats back from those devices. Want to know which users are sucking up your bandwidth? Point snmp & mrtg at your managed switch & go bonk the offender on the head. Want to know which virus you get sent the most? Do some data massaging on your mail logs and report with rrdtool (in a script, of course), then you can see your virus stats at a glance. You can add all this info to a single web page and have all your important network information available at one bookmark. 6) "Network Management Suites" such as HP Openview and others that try to tie a lot of things together into one central application. Sometimes these work well, other times they don't. Most vendors are willing to give you a crippled demo, but the demo invariably cripples the part that you were interested in. Most of these are reporting tools, but that's a big part of management. The context of your message makes me think that you were looking more for user/client computer management tools. For the user part LDAP seems to be one answer, but it's big and complex and difficult to wrap your head around at first. "Lightweight" my ass. :) For the computer management: you can use samba to some degree. You can also use the pstools suite to craft your own remote management stuff. There may be a third party tool out there that might help. Novell might be cooking something up to add to NDS (or maybe they already have -- I haven't looked at Novell in a long, long time.) HTH, and I'm looking forward to a good discussion on the list about this sort of thing -- if it's not too OT. --J(K) From dsimoes@linkshare.com Thu Nov 11 16:50:34 2004 From: dsimoes@linkshare.com (Dan Simoes) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 11:50:34 -0500 Subject: [WBEL-users] ROOTKIT checking software In-Reply-To: <20041111163557.GA10677@hawk.birddog.com> Message-ID: <200411111650.iABGoTWB028778@mail.linkshare.com> How about the chkrootkit software? http://www.chkrootkit.org/ From denis@just-servers.co.uk Thu Nov 11 16:58:06 2004 From: denis@just-servers.co.uk (Denis Croombs) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:58:06 -0000 Subject: [WBEL-users] ROOTKIT checking software In-Reply-To: <20041111163557.GA10677@hawk.birddog.com> Message-ID: <200411111658.iABGwFc29799@sentry.3d-computers.co.uk> Many thanks for all the usefull info, I am now looking at these so far the systems are clean. I am very impressed by some of the tricks in the response from Kirby and will be using them, they look amazing. Thanks Again Denis --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 01/11/2004 From weeboy@conorwynne.com Thu Nov 11 17:39:11 2004 From: weeboy@conorwynne.com (Conor Wynne) Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:39:11 +0000 Subject: [WBEL-users] Enterprise Managment Suggestions In-Reply-To: <4193835C.5040706@ew3d.com> References: <001401c4c7fc$99093520$0a00a8c0@wonderland> <1100185120.14654.59.camel@secdev.cox.net> <4193835C.5040706@ew3d.com> Message-ID: <1100194751.3813.0.camel@snowwhite.conorwynne.com> --=-vUfpGD84UY+RJ4akOnjd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 15:21, John Hinton wrote: > > > >On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 09:41, Tony wrote: > > =20 > > > >>Sorry if this is a tad OT, but does anyone have suggestions for 'enterp= rise > >>management' tools? Nessus?=20 --=20 Conor Wynne Dublin, Irlande. GPG Key: http://www.conorwynne.com/gpg-key --=-vUfpGD84UY+RJ4akOnjd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBk6O/TlURc8L++sIRAlDLAJ0XuR+lOJZPZre1s6ge9bOf9uHgywCfU3UX rB7SETm3X+KnB0rd35IPnFg= =GXL6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vUfpGD84UY+RJ4akOnjd-- From hawk82| "Denis Croombs"
<denis@just-servers.co.uk>
Sent by: whitebox-users-admin@beau.org 11/12/2004 04:01 AM
|
|
I have just taken over admin for approx 20 Linux systems (RH9.0) and need to check that they have not been rootkit'd (for my own piece of mind) anybody had experience of good toolkits for finding out of a system has been compromised ? That is before I prepare a plan to change them to Whitebox over the coming weeks/months. Thanks Denis _______________________________________________ Whitebox-users mailing list Whitebox-users@beau.org http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
|
See BUG. "That's not a bug, it's a feature!" A bug can be changed to a feature by documenting it. Michael Falzon (RHCT) Mozy's Swamp BBs & Red Dwarf BBs http://mozysswamp.org Registered LFS User #406 Registered Linux User #204397 |
Hi, I have one problem.
First install x86_64 version with default kernel =
2.4.21-15
and detect four CPU. I have one Dell 1850 with 2 Xeon 2.8. Upgrade =
kernel to
2.4.21-20 and only detect one cpu =BF?=BF?
Next install kernel smp, reboot, choice.. =
boot…..error
loading scsi_mod, same for 2.4.21-15 smp.
Some idea ??
Rodrigo Cortes.