[WBEL-users] redhat seems committed to keep is RHEL SRPMS open

William Hooper whooperhsd2@earthlink.net
Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:57:22 -0400 (EDT)


Mace.Scott@tatravelcenters.com said:
> Well, they actually have to.  The GPL requires them to.

Groan.

<rehash GPL licensing discussion>
Not all the software is GPL.
The GPL only requires you to distribute source to people you distribute
the binaries to.
There are many ways that Red Hat could protect access the SRPMs if they
wanted to.
</rehash GPL licensing discussion>

Let's please not start this up again.

-- 
William Hooper