[WBEL-users] whitebox reply-to address

Vicki Reeves vickir@beau.org
Sun, 17 Oct 2004 17:27:09 -0500


Thomas Knoop wrote:
> Why is the reply-to set to *not* answer to the list?

There are 2 schools of thought on this.  For the whole argument, see the 
majordomo archives.  This quote from that source lists the three main 
reasons for setting a list up as this one is:

> 1) it's clear to everyone who you are replying to, plus
>    that person gets an immediate copy even if the list is slow
> 
> 2) some people don't see ANY headers in their mail tool,
>    so this is the ONLY way they know who wrote the post!
>    (unless you convince everyone to use a sig block, or
>    set up the server to add the posting address to the body)
> 
> 3) you have a choice, without copy/paste, of replying
>    only to the poster or to the whole list (based on
>    using "reply" or "reply to all"). Remember that some
>    braindead mail tools don't show headers, so if a
>    person wants to reply off-list, they may not be able
>    to do it if you've configured all replies to the list.





-- 
========================================================================
This is me:
Vicki Reeves          vickir@beau.org        http://www.beau.org/~vickir

This is where I work:
Beauregard Parish Library                        http://library.beau.org
205 South Washington Ave, DeRidder, LA 70634           (337)463-6217 x19
  The Library does not necessarily agree with everything I write :-D

Geek code 3.1:GIT d? s-:++ a? C++ L++$ W++ w-- Y+ b+ G e r+++

                              <><