[WBEL-users] wbel respin2

[Greg Knaddison]

Do we really need to go down this road again of people saying 'I want
this, I want that, WB isn't exactly what I want." and then other
people saying "yeah, open up the community to more developers so we
can do more stuff" and then other people saying "this is John's
business, let him do what he wants."

I hope I've just summarized the points of view and ended this thread
where it sits.

We don't really need to rehash this, do we?

Greg

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:19:06 -0700, Sean Dogar <sean at catfeeder.net> wrote:
> Graham Purcocks wrote:
> 
> > Dave. My thoughts *exactly*. I just didn't write them down :)
> >
> > I'm sure there are things in 4 which some people need and are waiting
> > for, but the bigger base and SATA in particular, should be addressed
> > first.
> >
> >
> >
> > Dave J. Hala Jr. wrote:
> >
> >> I think respin 2 is also more important.  I thought the whole of point
> >> WB was to have a stable distro over a long period of time.
> >> Its cool to have new toys...(4.0) but for me, its business first, toys
> >> second.
> >>
> >>
> I couldn't agree more with you guys.  I just got WBEL 3 accepted for use
> by my company; we're replacing RH 8...the life-cylce is a big deal for
> me.   There are a lot of political hoops and testing to accomplish to
> switch, so WBEL 3 will be in use by me for a while....
> 
> -Sean
> _______________________________________________
> Whitebox-users mailing list
> Whitebox-users at beau.org
> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
>