[WBEL-users] Re: wbel-u] Availability of WBEL 4?

[Robert Kropiewnicki]

On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 02:00:55 +0000 (GMT), Lance Davis <lance at uklinux.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Raimo Koski wrote:
> 
> >
> > > Raimo,
> > >
> > > how the ---- does that belong on the WBEL list?
> > >
> > > The initial reply seemed fine ... someone was asking about wbel4 ... and
> > > someone said, hey, there is a centos 4 if you want to try it.  So far,
> > > nothing wrong.
> >
> > So it is ok for centos developers (Karanbir Singh, donavan nelson, and
> > you) and business partners (Lance Davis, uklinux.net) to promote centos
> > here.
> 
> and what makes you differentiate me as a business partner :)
> 
> I am in fact one of the lead developers and the original founder of
> CentOS.
> 
> Lance
> --

Lance,

While I applaud the hard work and effort of the CentOS team, I also
question whether it is proper for the CentOS team to spend so much
time promoting their distribution on the Whitebox mailing list.

This is "whitebox-users" after all, not
"alternate-distribution-announcements-for-those-using-whitebox".

Regards,

Rob