[WBEL-users] Re: wbel-u] Availability of WBEL 4?

[Matthew Hodgett]

For my 5 cents I do not think the 'hawking' of another distribution is
quite kosher, but I absolutley applaud any contributions anybody makes
to the open source community (alas, my contribution is seriously
lacking). I have seen some tremendous assistance from the CentOS
community on this group, yet also find the CentOS forums lacking.
Personally I say welcome but remember netiquette. And I'm sure John
doesn't mind otherwise he would have sent his lawyers - oh, sorry, that
was redhat.

Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: whitebox-users-bounces at beau.org
[mailto:whitebox-users-bounces at beau.org] On Behalf Of Robert
Kropiewnicki
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 9:58 PM
To: whitebox-users at beau.org
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] Re: wbel-u] Availability of WBEL 4?


On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:11:59 -0600, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu>
wrote:
> Robert Kropiewnicki wrote:
> 
> > While I applaud the hard work and effort of the CentOS team, I also 
> > question whether it is proper for the CentOS team to spend so much 
> > time promoting their distribution on the Whitebox mailing list.
> 
> Bah.  IMO, he done anything remotely improper nor egregiously promoted

> CentOS (...in contrast to some individuals of other rhel clones)  And 
> for what Lance does post here, I, for one appreciate it.
> 
> -- Rex

Rex,

My questioning was not aimed solely at Lance.  For what it is worth, it
probably should not have been aimed solely at the CentOS team.

Unless a pointed question is asked about what other distribution(s)
support a feature that is missing in WBEL, I feel it is inappropriate to
be hawking those distributions here.

Of course, it's simply my opinion.

Regards,

Rob
_______________________________________________
Whitebox-users mailing list
Whitebox-users at beau.org http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users