[WBEL-users] Respin updates question

[Graham Purcocks]

Yes

Karl-Koenig Koenigsson wrote:
> Does that mean that having an old installation of WBEL and having kept
> that one up to date with yum renders me the same system as a fresh
> install of Respin?
> 
> I would assume so, but it does not hurt to ask :-)
> 
> 
>    Karl-Koenig Koenigsson
> 
> 
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:48:56 +0000, Graham Purcocks
> <grahamp at wsieurope.com> wrote:
> 
>>Marc
>>
>>The respins are never maintained. Its just a snapshot of WBEL at a
>>particular time. Respin 1 was RHEL update 2 and Respin 2 is update 4.
>>It's WBEL 3 which is maintained. Updates apply after either respin, you
>>just need fewer updates on the later respin. Also the later respin will
>>install on more recent hardware.
>>
>>And no for the last question as WBEL hasn't changed as explained above.
>>
>>Hope this helps
>>Graham
>>
>>Plug N Play wrote:
>>
>>>Dear All,
>>>
>>>Greetings to all, I have two small questions :
>>>
>>>With the release of respin2.
>>>
>>>1. Will respin1 continue to be maintained? (receive updates from whitebox
>>>maintainer).
>>>2. If I install respin2, Do I need to change my path to my rsync mirros? My
>>>current path is
>>>rsync://mirrors.esat.net/ftp/mirrors/whiteboxlinux.org/3.0/en/os/i386/
>>>
>>>Thank you all,
>>>Marc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Whitebox-users mailing list
>>Whitebox-users at beau.org
>>http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Whitebox-users mailing list
> Whitebox-users at beau.org
> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: grahamp.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/attachments/20050316/78519020/grahamp-0001.vcf