[WBEL-users] updates

[Johnny Hughes]

On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 11:11 -0700, bishop wrote:
> 
> Craig White wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 10:47 -0700, bishop wrote:
> > 
> >>William Hooper wrote:
> >>
> >>>Jose Moreira wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hello, i installed WHL4 today, but i cant find updates i any of there
> >>>>repos, the 'updates' directory's are all empty.
> >>>
> >>>http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/2005-May/006276.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I'm currently using :
> >>>>[root at whitewiz ~]# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
> >>>>rpm http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/jpackage/ 1.6/generic free
> >>>>rpm-src http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/jpackage/ 1.6/generic free non-free
> >>>>rpm http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/jpackage/ 1.6/redhat-el-4.0 free non-free
> >>>
> >>>None of these are WBEL repos anyway.
> >>
> >>Hey Folks,
> >>
> >>Please slap me if I just didn't see it, but is there an APTified WBEL4 
> >>repository of packages anywhere?  I need to apt-get build-dep (and 
> >>build) some stuff, and the added minor pain of doing it by hand is just 
> >>pushing the deferring the build task instead.  And I can't get YUM to 
> >>play nice on this fresh install.
> >>
> >>I'm hoping for someone (Erik?  Please?) may have mirrored and aptified 
> >>something official from the mother-ship.
> >>
> >>Sorry for taking your time, and thanks for any assistance you can provide.
> > 
> > ----
> > http://dag.wieers.com/packages/apt/
> 
> Sorry, Craig, but I didn't see a REPOSITORY OF APTIFIED WBEL4 PACKAGES 
> at that location -- but thank you for the effort.
> 
> Additionally, the packages I see at 
> http://apt.sw.be/redhat/el4/en/i386/SRPMS.dag/, the reference Dag's 
> stuffing into the apt.conf in those apt packages seem to be his own 
> packages;  again, not exactly the official RPMs I'm needing here, in 
> addition to not quite a practice I'd endorse except at gunpoint.
> 
> As I said, the effort was good but the result wasn't right, exactly. 
> Anyone else with a better lead?
> 

Not that it is exactly what you want ... but for the vast majority of
packages, they will be the same.

CentOS has a apt repo for CentOS-4 here:

http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/apt/i386/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/attachments/20050518/e9da8c0d/attachment.bin