[WBEL-users] Re: About the Updates for Whiteboxlinux (part II)

[Jerry Amundson]

On Sat October 8 2005 17:07, Tony Wicks wrote:
> Let's not beat about the bush here. Due to the structure of Whitebox
> (ie, one person doing the lot and not being interested in anybody
> else helping, despite lots of offers), it really should not be used
> by anyone but BEAU. John releasing the project to the public, but
> refusing help effectively makes it a dead duck. I moved all my
> Whitebox machines to Centos a long time ago and have not looked back.
> I'm out of here, and I'm sorry to say I'm taking my mirror server
> (ftp.wicks.co.nz) with me.

For starters, the 8th grade called - they want their drama back... :-)

Perhaps I'm a bit of a WB-newbie, and of course I missed the original 
threads, but:
1. What help was offered? (as you claim), and
2. What reasons, if any, were given for it's refusal?

Weighing my options,
jerry