[WBEL-users] Update kernel rpm packages
Edwards, Scott (GE Healthcare)
J.Scott.Edwards at ge.com
Tue Jan 10 09:34:53 CST 2006
Kind of ironic, the reason we switched to WBEL4 was to get away from
FC2 because I didn't want to try to maintain it any longer :)
If there is anything I can do to help let me know.
Thanks
-Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: whitebox-users-bounces at beau.org
[mailto:whitebox-users-bounces at beau.org]On Behalf Of John Morris
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 8:33 PM
To: whitebox-users at beau.org
Subject: RE: [WBEL-users] Update kernel rpm packages
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 11:55, Edwards, Scott (GE Healthcare) wrote:
> I don't want to pressure you or anything, I was just wondering if
> there was any sort of wild estimate on when WBEL4's turn was coming?
As soon as I get em built. Finally have em downloaded and stuff, but
I'm now seeing the same things I saw with WBEL3 packages built in a
chroot build hosted on WBEL4. Really don't want to be maintaining FC2
forever so want to solve that problem.
--
John M. http://www.beau.org/~jmorris This post is 100% M$Free!
Geekcode 3.1:GCS C+++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ W++ w--- Y++ b++ 5+++ R tv- e* r
_______________________________________________
Whitebox-users mailing list
Whitebox-users at beau.org
http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
More information about the Whitebox-users
mailing list