[WBEL-users] Re: File system from 3.x to 4.x is different?

[Alon]

M$ is of course the mother of all evil :)) no doubt.
I am trying to convert, please don't hate :)).

A bit more specifically:

I am trying to set up a remote access to servers via KVM-over-IP and have
clean install of OS on demand.

For that, I have a USB-DiskOnKey with a bootable partition.
What I'm looking to do is:

Boot from the DiskOnKey (mind you that I have only 30MB of space on it).
Be able to do an install from network over IP.
I have a repository server that holds files on it.
I need to boot from the USB-DiskOnKey,. run the installation process of the
WBEL 4.0 via Network.
Any suggestions for a "converter-in-progress"?

If you have a bootable image that I can load onto the USB-DiskOnKey that
will provide me with an
install process and FTP or whatever is needed for the network installation,
it would be great.

Thanks,


- Alon
js at wsco.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Amundson" <jerry at pbs.com>
To: <whitebox-users at beau.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 4:36 AM
Subject: [WBEL-users] Re: File system from 3.x to 4.x is different?


> On Sat January 14 2006 17:57, Alon wrote:
>> Hi Y'all,
>>
>> I'm experiencing something weired.
>
> Most likely you did something differently, or it was done for you...
>
>> The primary difference is noted with Partition Magic:
>
> The Microsoft view of things doesn't mean much here...
>
>> Any pointers as to why this happening only with version 4.0 and not
>> with 3.0?
>
> Start with some basic linux sys. admin. stuff, "fdisk -l" for example.
>
> jerry
> _______________________________________________
> Whitebox-users mailing list
> Whitebox-users at beau.org
> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
>