[WBEL-users] WBEL 4.0 questions
fernando.apesteguia at gmail.com
Mon Jun 12 11:31:48 CDT 2006
Red Hat is conservative in some aspects. They experiment with Fedora
Project, including some edge features and then they select the most stable
things. I'm using WBEL 4.0 without problems in my laptop, working fine in:
- Hardware detection
- Hardware configuration
- Performance (If I'm not wrong, it is not compiled as preemptible... now I
have not my laptop here so this needs confirmation)
I think it's a good choice. You can also try CentOS, a bit more updated RHEL
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: K.L. <kl at attitia.com>
Date: Jun 12, 2006 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] WBEL 4.0 questions
To: Fernando Apesteguía <fernando.apesteguia at gmail.com>
Thanks for the reply Fernando.
In my defence, Microsoft thinks its OS'es are Enterprise ready as well......
If you get my drift.
Quoting Fernando Apesteguía <fernando.apesteguia at gmail.com>:
> Well, Red Hat thinks 2.6 is enterprise ready.
> About architecture issues, I'm not sure, but Intel Xeon is 32 bit and
> similar to IA-32 architecture, so download the i386 CD's. The single or
> kernel will be installed depending on the system.
> Best regards
Sent using Attitia Mail.
How are we doing?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Whitebox-users