[WBEL-users] Upgrading to 2.6.9-42.0.3

Fernando Apesteguía fernando.apesteguia at gmail.com
Wed Nov 15 08:14:21 CST 2006


On 11/15/06, Vic <whitebox at beer.org.uk> wrote:
> > One follow-up quesiton:
> >
> > When I did the rpmbuild -ba .... it generated all of these packages:
> > kernel-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm
> > kernel-debuginfo-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm
> > kernel-devel-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm
> > kernel-largesmp-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm
> > kernel-largesmp-devel-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm
> > kernel-smp-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm
> > kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-42.0.3.EL.x86_64.rpm
> >
> > I'm just interested in the first one. It's possible to generate only
> > this one to save some time?
>
> Yes.
>
> Have a look at the .spec file - it has the lines :
>
> %define buildup 1
> %define buildsmp 1
> %define buildsource 0
> %define buildhugemem 1
> %define buildlargesmp 1
>
> Change the "1"S to "0"s if you don't want to build that version.

Hey man, once again (and I've done this a lot of times :) ) thank you very much.
Just another question:

If I link the BUIL/kernel-xxx/linux-2.6.9-xxx to /usr/src/linux,
programs that expect to have the kernel sources in /usr/src/linux
right?
However, some programs (like the ATI drivers) return a "not version.h
file found"

Do you know something about this?

Thanks
>
> HTH
>
> Vic.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Whitebox-users mailing list
> Whitebox-users at beau.org
> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
>


More information about the Whitebox-users mailing list