[WBEL-users] WBEL updates
ssilva at sgvwater.com
Fri Oct 13 13:19:46 CDT 2006
Purcocks, Graham spake the following on 10/13/2006 7:04 AM:
> That's what I found. There is the new kernel for Update 8 but only a
> fraction of the other changes (we have RHEL3 servers as well). So it's
> only a small part of the update. Which is why I think it is weird. I
> would think John would do nothing or it all.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: whitebox-users-bounces at beau.org
> [mailto:whitebox-users-bounces at beau.org] On Behalf Of
> liz at indract.freeserve.co.uk
> Sent: 13 October 2006 14:21
> To: whitebox-users at beau.org
> Subject: [WBEL-users] WBEL updates
> Dear everyone
> I have read the latest postings with some concern as I have a good many
> White Box 4.0 machines and a couple of WBEL 3.0. As they are all well
> behind the firewall or do not connect to the internet I do not run auto
> update but only update manually when required.
> BUT I have checked the mirror at ESAT (the one I usually use) and the
> Version 3.0 Updates folder has been touched on 15/9/06 and indeed a new
> kernel (2.4.21-47.EL athlon.rpm) has been added, plus lots of other bits
> and bobs and as far as I can tell from the Firefox browser on this
> (Windows - sorry) machine ESAT looks OK from here. The Version 4.0
> Updates folder has been touched and files added 12/09/06.
> 4.1 is still at April 06 though.
> So it's not quite dead yet. Hope this helps?
The fact that John hasn't jumped in on the list leads me to believe that
something is wrong. Lets hope that it is just work pressures, and not anything
in his personal life.
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
More information about the Whitebox-users