[WBEL-users] Fast system clock
john at grumpet.net
john at grumpet.net
Mon Mar 19 12:56:04 CDT 2007
Does this happen to be a dual-core CPU?
John
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Francies Moore wrote:
> Hi
>
> An update on the above ( have been busy elsewhere so have only just come back
> to it).
>
> clock=pit or clock=tsc worked about equally to make the system usable,
> although even with ntp running there was a 'creep' of about 10 minutes over
> 12 hours. pmtmr did not make much difference to the high speed.
>
> As typing in a terminal produced repeating keys making working with it
> impossible, I had to reboot to change grub.conf, using an earlier kernel.
>
> Now the system is spraying SMART errors so looks like a replacement HD is
> necessary.... it's a Maxtor.... arghhh .
>
> Probably will put WBEL3 respin2 or CentOS 3.1 on any new HD as I have them
> both to hand. And maybe a new m/b battery. If I can get it working
> satisfactorily it will live only on an internal network so a 3 version should
> do.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Francies
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:10:54 +0000
>> From: Francies Moore <liz at indract.freeserve.co.uk>
>> Subject: [WBEL-users] Fast system clock
>> To: ssilva at sgvwater.com, whitebox-users at beau.org
>> Message-ID: <45E0395E.5030102 at indract.freeserve.co.uk>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>>
>>
>>> Is the CentOS install running the same kernel version as the Whitebox
>>> install
>>> was running?
>>>
>>>
>> Hi Scott
>>
>> It was running the latest 2.6.9.42 kernel from CentOS but I have reverted
>> it to the original WBEL kernel 2.6.9(whatever - sorry the box isn't here)
>> and the time then stayed nearer to being correct, although it was slowly
>> gaining when I left it last night.
>>
>> Incidentally Knoppix 3.8.1 was unusable on this box as it was "too fast" -
>> each keypress caused immediate repeating and so even the shell could not be
>> used (kernel 2.6.11).
>>
>> Looks like I have a box which don't like kernel 2.6... Maybe I should try
>> WBEL3 or CentOS 3 on it next week (or FC1) - it would be nice to be able to
>> deploy this system usefully.
>>
>> (I will post my Up2date errors later so as not to confuse the issue!)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Francies
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:49:20 -0600
>> From: Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com>
>> Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] Fast system clock
>> To: WhiteBox Users <whitebox-users at beau.org>
>> Message-ID: <1172335760.26284.83.camel at myth.home.local>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>
>> On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 13:10 +0000, Francies Moore wrote:
>>
>>>> Is the CentOS install running the same kernel version as the Whitebox
>>>> install
>>>> was running?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hi Scott
>>>
>>> It was running the latest 2.6.9.42 kernel from CentOS but I have reverted
>>> it to the original WBEL kernel 2.6.9(whatever - sorry the box isn't here)
>>> and the time then stayed nearer to being correct, although it was slowly
>>> gaining when I left it last night.
>>>
>>> Incidentally Knoppix 3.8.1 was unusable on this box as it was "too fast" -
>>> each keypress caused immediate repeating and so even the shell could not
>>> be used (kernel 2.6.11).
>>>
>>> Looks like I have a box which don't like kernel 2.6... Maybe I should try
>>> WBEL3 or CentOS 3 on it next week (or FC1) - it would be nice to be able
>>> to deploy this system usefully.
>>>
>>> (I will post my Up2date errors later so as not to confuse the issue!)
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Francies
>>>
>>
>> clock=pit
>>
>> or
>>
>> clock=pmtmr
>>
>> or
>>
>> clock=tsc
>>
>> on the kernel line might help (tsc is the default)
>>
>> http://kb.vmware.com/KanisaPlatform/Publishing/329/1420_f.SAL_Public.html
>>
>> (that link is for vmware, but it is applicable to normal machines too)
>>
>> also check for updated bios from the motherboard manufacturer.
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>> Name: not available
>> Type: application/pgp-signature
>> Size: 189 bytes
>> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
>> Url :
>> http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/attachments/20070224/53cef983/attachment-0001.bin
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Whitebox-users mailing list
>> Whitebox-users at beau.org
>> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
>>
>>
>> End of Whitebox-users Digest, Vol 26, Issue 5
>> *********************************************
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Whitebox-users mailing list
> Whitebox-users at beau.org
> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
>
More information about the Whitebox-users
mailing list