<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.0.6619.9">
<TITLE>I was subscribed to this list and cannot unsubscribe</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Sorry for the post. I was added back into this mailing list<BR>
just recently probably due to a rebuild of the mailing list<BR>
server/database or something.<BR>
<BR>
I am unable to unsubscribe from this list.<BR>
<BR>
Can the administrator please remove me from the list permanently!<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
<BR>
Ed<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: whitebox-users-bounces@beau.org on behalf of whitebox-users-request@beau.org<BR>
Sent: Thu 3/22/2007 1:01 PM<BR>
To: whitebox-users@beau.org<BR>
Cc: <BR>
Subject: Whitebox-users Digest, Vol 27, Issue 9<BR>
<BR>
Send Whitebox-users mailing list submissions to<BR>
whitebox-users@beau.org<BR>
<BR>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<BR>
<A HREF="http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users">http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users</A><BR>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<BR>
whitebox-users-request@beau.org<BR>
<BR>
You can reach the person managing the list at<BR>
whitebox-users-owner@beau.org<BR>
<BR>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<BR>
than "Re: Contents of Whitebox-users digest..."<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Today's Topics:<BR>
<BR>
1. Re: What should I be using for servers in yum? (Dale)<BR>
2. Re: What should I be using for servers in yum? (Scott Silva)<BR>
3. Re: What should I be using for servers in yum? (Dale)<BR>
4. RE: What should I be using for servers in yum? (Purcocks, Graham)<BR>
5. Re: What should I be using for servers in yum? (Vic)<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>
<BR>
Message: 1<BR>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:03:34 -0500<BR>
From: Dale <lists@ehome.net><BR>
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?<BR>
To: Whitebox-users@beau.org<BR>
Message-ID: <4601B9C6.1090107@ehome.net><BR>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed<BR>
<BR>
Wow, anyone still on this list besides me?<BR>
<BR>
Just trying to find an appropriate list of yum update servers to update<BR>
my remaining WB server. I have updated it to the latest posting I could<BR>
find on the list, but that still doesn't work.<BR>
<BR>
Dale wrote:<BR>
> Hi all, have a WB3.x server that has very little use and I missed the<BR>
> appropriate posts for what I need to change and what to change it to<BR>
> in order for yum to download appropriate updates (including hopefully<BR>
> the appropriate updates for the new US time zones).<BR>
><BR>
> Thanks in advance for the info.<BR>
><BR>
> Dale<BR>
> _______________________________________________<BR>
> Whitebox-users mailing list<BR>
> Whitebox-users@beau.org<BR>
> <A HREF="http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users">http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users</A><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
------------------------------<BR>
<BR>
Message: 2<BR>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:41:20 -0700<BR>
From: Scott Silva <ssilva@sgvwater.com><BR>
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?<BR>
To: whitebox-users@beau.org<BR>
Message-ID: <etsfr1$8mi$1@sea.gmane.org><BR>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8<BR>
<BR>
Dale spake the following on 3/21/2007 4:03 PM:<BR>
> Wow, anyone still on this list besides me?<BR>
><BR>
> Just trying to find an appropriate list of yum update servers to update<BR>
> my remaining WB server. I have updated it to the latest posting I could<BR>
> find on the list, but that still doesn't work.<BR>
><BR>
This list sees less traffic than a 90 year old prostitute!<BR>
There was mention of an "alternate" update source in the works, but haven't<BR>
seen anything else about it. I think many people have just migrated to Centos<BR>
or Scientific Linux, or some other enterprise class distro. Or as was said on<BR>
the list before, "No one is having any problems, so the list is quiet". I find<BR>
the latter hard to believe.<BR>
<BR>
--<BR>
<BR>
MailScanner is like deodorant...<BR>
You hope everybody uses it, and<BR>
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
------------------------------<BR>
<BR>
Message: 3<BR>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:47:18 -0500<BR>
From: Dale <lists@ehome.net><BR>
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?<BR>
To: whitebox-users@beau.org<BR>
Message-ID: <4601E026.8070206@ehome.net><BR>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"<BR>
<BR>
Hi Scott,<BR>
<BR>
Scott Silva wrote:<BR>
> Dale spake the following on 3/21/2007 4:03 PM:<BR>
> <BR>
>> Wow, anyone still on this list besides me?<BR>
>><BR>
>> Just trying to find an appropriate list of yum update servers to update<BR>
>> my remaining WB server. I have updated it to the latest posting I could<BR>
>> find on the list, but that still doesn't work.<BR>
>> <BR>
> This list sees less traffic than a 90 year old prostitute!<BR>
> There was mention of an "alternate" update source in the works, but haven't<BR>
> seen anything else about it. I think many people have just migrated to Centos<BR>
> or Scientific Linux, or some other enterprise class distro. Or as was said on<BR>
> the list before, "No one is having any problems, so the list is quiet". I find<BR>
> the latter hard to believe.<BR>
><BR>
> <BR>
I hadn't been having much of any problems on this one remaining WB 3.x<BR>
machine, the others have been migrated to CentOS, just need to get this<BR>
one updated as it won't be migrated to CentOS for a few months.<BR>
<BR>
Dale<BR>
-------------- next part --------------<BR>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<BR>
URL: <A HREF="http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/attachments/20070321/e56f371e/attachment-0001.htm">http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/attachments/20070321/e56f371e/attachment-0001.htm</A><BR>
<BR>
------------------------------<BR>
<BR>
Message: 4<BR>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:55:14 -0400<BR>
From: "Purcocks, Graham" <grahamp@wsieurope.com><BR>
Subject: RE: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?<BR>
To: "Scott Silva" <ssilva@sgvwater.com>, <whitebox-users@beau.org><BR>
Message-ID:<BR>
<8536F69C1FCC294B859D07B179F069440825CB34@EXCHANGE.ad.wsicorp.com><BR>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<BR>
<BR>
I use //ftp.esat.net/mirrors/whiteboxlinux.org/3.0<BR>
<BR>
But I've found the games rpm header is corrupt which stops a lot of the<BR>
checking. SO I haven't installed the last update.<BR>
<BR>
Is anyone else using this mirror and seeing the same problem? If we had<BR>
another official mirror I'd pull from them. Maybe I'll try direct from<BR>
Beau. Mirrors, do seem to be an issue.<BR>
<BR>
Graham<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: whitebox-users-bounces@beau.org<BR>
[<A HREF="mailto:whitebox-users-bounces@beau.org">mailto:whitebox-users-bounces@beau.org</A>] On Behalf Of Scott Silva<BR>
Sent: 21 March 2007 23:41<BR>
To: whitebox-users@beau.org<BR>
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?<BR>
<BR>
Dale spake the following on 3/21/2007 4:03 PM:<BR>
> Wow, anyone still on this list besides me?<BR>
><BR>
> Just trying to find an appropriate list of yum update servers to<BR>
update<BR>
> my remaining WB server. I have updated it to the latest posting I<BR>
could<BR>
> find on the list, but that still doesn't work.<BR>
><BR>
This list sees less traffic than a 90 year old prostitute!<BR>
There was mention of an "alternate" update source in the works, but<BR>
haven't<BR>
seen anything else about it. I think many people have just migrated to<BR>
Centos<BR>
or Scientific Linux, or some other enterprise class distro. Or as was<BR>
said on<BR>
the list before, "No one is having any problems, so the list is quiet".<BR>
I find<BR>
the latter hard to believe.<BR>
<BR>
--<BR>
<BR>
MailScanner is like deodorant...<BR>
You hope everybody uses it, and<BR>
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!<BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
Whitebox-users mailing list<BR>
Whitebox-users@beau.org<BR>
<A HREF="http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users">http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users</A><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
------------------------------<BR>
<BR>
Message: 5<BR>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:46:01 -0000 (GMT)<BR>
From: "Vic" <whitebox@beer.org.uk><BR>
Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] What should I be using for servers in yum?<BR>
To: whitebox-users@beau.org<BR>
Message-ID: <40042.10.0.0.4.1174567561.squirrel@10.0.0.4><BR>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1<BR>
<BR>
> There was mention of an "alternate" update source in the works, but<BR>
> haven't seen anything else about it.<BR>
<BR>
I'm not sure it's relevant any more - I've just had a whole bunch of<BR>
updates from the pre-existing servers. Looks like JM's back on the case.<BR>
Welcome back, mate!<BR>
<BR>
Vic.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
------------------------------<BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
Whitebox-users mailing list<BR>
Whitebox-users@beau.org<BR>
<A HREF="http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users">http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users</A><BR>
<BR>
<BR>
End of Whitebox-users Digest, Vol 27, Issue 9<BR>
*********************************************<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>