[WBEL-users] About WB maintainers

[Mathieu LUBRANO]

Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME
--=_alternative 00231DC2C1256EED_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

Hello,

I'm considering putting a few WB boxes on production, and the last message 
on wb-announce list about John's holidays, John wordload with errata 
floods and so on make me wonder if it's a good idea... 
Sure this is a quality work, but:
Is John the only one WB maintainer ? no backups ?
Did someone here discussed that with beau.org/John before ?

WB seems the most active RHEL clone, and the cleanest rebuild (compared to 
tao and centos), but what if beau.org or John give up ?

(of course this is not a distro war post, please don't go that way).

Bye,
Mat.
--=_alternative 00231DC2C1256EED_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Hello,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif"><br>
I'm considering putting a few WB boxes on production, and the last message
on wb-announce list about John's holidays, John wordload with errata floods
and so on make me wonder if it's a good idea... &nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Sure this is a quality work, but:</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Is John the only one WB maintainer ?
no backups ?</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Did someone here discussed that with
beau.org/John before ?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">WB seems the most active RHEL clone,
and the cleanest rebuild (compared to tao and centos), but what if beau.org
or John give up ?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">(of course this is not a distro war
post, please don't go that way).</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Bye,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Mat.</font>
--=_alternative 00231DC2C1256EED_=--