[WBEL-devel] up2date patches

[John Morris]

On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, John A. Tamplin wrote:

> Since it doesn't hurt anything to have extra keys, doesn't that argue for 
> having the Fedora key as well?  RHL9 isn't going to have any new packages 
> after April, but Fedora will.  Of course, over time they may diverge 
> enough that the packages aren't useful to us, but only time will tell.

Very good idea.  Because even if the binary packages drift a little the
srpms should certainly stay compatible for at least '04 and by then we
will be starting the beta cycle for RHEL4/WBEL4 anyway and get to decide
again.  :)

-- 
John M.      http://www.beau.org/~jmorris        This post is 100% M$ Free!
Geekcode 3.1:GCS C+++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ W++ w--- Y++ b++ 5+++ R tv- e* r