[WBEL-devel] ncurses4

[John Morris]

On Sun, 7 Dec 2003, John Hinton wrote:

> Hmmm.. a good diversion. WBEL stable and unstable! What a novel idea. :)
> 
> I must throw in my vote that I will only use WBEL if it holds as close 
> as possible to RHEL. I'll be running this on mission critical machines 
> and even RedHat had a bad blunder or three.

The main cd set will be the output of the Red Hat SRPMS modified only as 
required to conform to trademark removal and connecting to a different 
source of updates.

-- 
John M.      http://www.beau.org/~jmorris        This post is 100% M$ Free!
Geekcode 3.1:GCS C+++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ W++ w--- Y++ b++ 5+++ R tv- e* r