[WBEL-devel] LVM version 1.0.8-5 broken
John Morris
jmorris@beau.org
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:16:04 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Raimo Koski wrote:
> The real solution is to add more options to setarch.
Not really. The correct way to determine the kernel version to build for
would be to look at the kernel-headers package version if building
packages in a chrooted environment is the preferred way, and I think it
is. (The alternative being racks of seperate machines or user-mode linux
for sites trying to support diverse distributions, chroot is far easier.)
If somebody fixed setarch/uname for kernel version, next we would have
people looking down /proc or something for version info. Package
management should use it's own datastore whenever possible, nothing else
is really safe. I'd say it is a bug in the .spec so I opened #133309.
--
John M. http://www.beau.org/~jmorris This post is 100% M$ Free!
Geekcode 3.1:GCS C+++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ W++ w--- Y++ b++ 5+++ R tv- e* r