[WBEL-devel] Re: [WBEL-users] Respin 2?

[bishop]

John,

No go.

The only difference between -3 and -3.1 is a %release bump (to invoke a 
new build) and the comment you mention:

> --- RPM-libao-0.8.3-3/SPECS/libao.spec  2003-01-22 13:42:53.000000000 -0800
> +++ RPM-libao-0.8.3-3.1/SPECS/libao.spec        2004-10-13 15:14:42.000000000 -0700
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  Summary: Cross Platform Audio Output Library.
>  Name: libao
>  Version: 0.8.3
> -Release: 3
> +Release: 3.1
>  Group: System Environment/Libraries
>  Copyright: GPL
>  URL: http://www.xiph.org/
> @@ -62,6 +62,9 @@
>  %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
> 
>  %changelog
> +* Wed Oct 13 2003 Colin Walters <walters@redhat.com> 0.8.3-3.1
> +- Rebuilt to fix multilib conflict (135636)
> +
>  * Wed Jan 22 2003 Tim Powers <timp@redhat.com>
>  - rebuilt
> 

It's something else that was altered, and upon which this depended, that 
was changed.

yay!

I ran a comparison of 085-2 and 083-3 and there were more minor 
differences, but not a bunch.  085-2 won't build either?

  - bish

John Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Bob Ramstad wrote:
> 
> 
>>Any thoughts on Respin 2?
> 
> 
> Yup, now that the holidays and all of the roadtrips are over with, that is
> #3 on the list.
> 
> #2 is getting the last of the U4 packages built.  Most are simple enough
> jobs of moving the WB patch forward but libao is crapping out on the build
> process.  This one looks to be interesting, it is crapping out linking up
> the esd plugin.  The generic spec file is adding --enable-static to the
> configure step while RH is omitting it from theirs.  Oddly enough the
> tarball seems to build without it when built manually but fails WITH that
> switch.  The last entry in the changelog is this little tidbit, which
> seems like it might be related:
> 
> * Wed Oct 13 2003 Colin Walters <walters@redhat.com> 0.8.3-3.1
> - Rebuilt to fix multilib conflict (135636)
> 
> But since bug 135636 is a bug mere mortals are not permitted to view in
> the RH bugzilla, looks like I get to go fish.  Going to poke around with
> it because it has to get rebuilt, but if this bug is shallow to one of the
> other pairs of eyes out on the list (cc'ing to -devel to increase those
> eyeballs) that would be great.  :)  Guess the first step is to grab the
> previous version and make a detailed comparison.

> First though, #1 is getting the website updated with the new mirrors.
> 

-- 
	For I am not so enamored of my own opinions
	that I disregard what others may think of them.	
				-- Nicolaus Copernicus