[WBEL-users] errata question

jcosta@lendlease.com jcosta@lendlease.com
Thu, 18 Dec 2003 15:46:12 -0500




I was under the impression that you had to pay RH to use up2date to get
security errata and bugfixes for RHEL. Does RH provide those same errata
and bugfixes in SRPM form? If so, is updating as "simple" as doing
something like this:

rpm -qi foo
rpm -i foo-1.0-1.src.rpm
rpm -ba SPECS/foo.spec
rpm -ivh foo-1.0-1.rpm

If this is necessary, will it negate using Yum, apt-get, or up2date? I
don't want to have my server maintenance workload increase by using WBL.
Apologies if this question has been asked and answered, but I could not
find any concrete answer in the mailing list archives.

Jeff


PS:  In the absence of a search tool for the archives, you can use Google
to search the archive with this syntax:   <keyword>
site:<beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/>



-----------------------------------------
"This email (including any attachments) is confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute or rely on the information contained in it.  If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply email and delete the email from your system.  Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this communication are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you.  Lend Lease does not guarantee that this email or the attachment(s) are unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other defects. Lend Lease may monitor incoming and outgoing emails for compliance with its Email Policy.  Please note that our servers may not be located in your country."