[WBEL-users] Eadem Enterprise is awesome!

[Michiel van Es]

Klaus Zahradnik wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 11:07:38PM -0400, Rene Herrero wrote:
> 
> [...snip...]
> 
> 
>>I know that some people are going to get offended after reading this 
>>(someone always does) but I'd like to point out that I'm in no way 
>>trying to bash White Box Linux.  On the contrary, I think they did a 
>>great job.  The reason I believe that Eadem has an edge over White Box 
>>is that they seem to focus more on quality than quantity (hint hint). 
> 
> 
> Am I supposed to understand that now? WBEL is supposed to be a truly
> free version of a stable server os. Which brings me to the topic of the
> gui: I do not install any gui on my servers. I do everything on the
> shell.
> 
> btw: Gnome rules! (scnr)
> 
> 
>>The only fault seen until now is the Eula file which is trivial in my 
>>opinion.
> 
> 
> And could (I did not read their EULA yet) be the one reason not to use
> this distro.
> 
> [...snip...]
>  
> 
>>Just my two cents.
> 
> 
> You sound like our sales people. Go and play somewhere else and please
> stop makeing adverts for eadem. Nobody asked for it, and my guess is,
> that most people here take your advertising as a reason not to use
> eadem.

Ai..that doesn't sood good at all ;)
But true..people are promoting other distro's on this mailing list.
The argumentation is lame (I like blackbox 'cause it's quick - why don't 
you install blackbox on WhiteBox then????? - DOH! )
People LIKE KDE and LIKE Gnome..nothing wrong wiht that..yes it is 
slower than BlackBox..but more user friendly IMHO..
> 
> best regards
> Klaus
> 
Michiel