[WBEL-users] WBEL Vs Centos ? :-S

[Raimo Koski]

On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, William Warren wrote:

> The lack of a respin does not make a distro worse than another. 

Johnny Hughes made similar comparisons. Respins are just easier to track 
because they are more visibly announced and in some rare cases better HW 
support may mean successfull install or not.
However the fact remains that WBEL is the slowest of the relatively well 
known and maintained ones.

> it is also interesting about your address which means you come 
> onto this list and bash another distro in favor of one you are 
> directly involved with.  This is fully unprofessional and IMO 
> should exclude your distro from any consideration int he future 
> until a fully apology for your behavior is made.

"I wrote http://developer.lineox.org/white_paper.html" was not hiding my 
involvement.
I feel no need to apologise for stating facts. What I am sorry about is 
that WBEL is giving all RHEL clones bad reputation.

-- 
Raimo Koski  http://www.lineox.com  http://www.raimokoski.com/