[WBEL-users] WBEL Vs Centos ? :-S

[donavan nelson]

Adam Thomas wrote:

>This is hideously off the mark.  We deploy WhiteBox on a few of our
>less critical boxes (mainly because we have the money to buy RedHat
>licenses) and it's probably going to stay that way for quite a while
>due to the fact that this is John's show.  I don't want a bunch of
>nitwit Linux-wannabes rebuilding errata for these boxes, even if the
>  
>
I resemble that remark thank you very much.   Ohh, but I don't rebuild 
errata.

>If you would rather use CentOS and write white papers on how awesome
>  
>
I don't recall anyone writing a white paper saying how great CentOS is.  
Perhaps someone wrote a white paper comparing how great their Commercial 
enterprise linux offering is compared to the rest of us "nitwit 
Linux-wannabes". 

Perhaps if you got your facts straight before you shoved your head in 
someone's backside...

>you are, why don't you do that on a list that isn't titled
>whitebox-users?  If you hate whitebox, chances are you're not a
>"whitebox-user".
>  
>
Last I heard this was an open list.  When John closes the list, I guess 
I'll be off the list.

><much drivel and some facts snipped>
>

>that there is.  The bottom line is that THESE ARE ALL RED HAT CLONES. 
>  
>
>THEY CLONE REDHAT.  None of them is going to offer you anything
>special over the other; you could probably pick based on which one has
>the best default wallpaper, for crying out loud.
>  
>
I was generally ignoring this thread, but this has to be the most 
asinine comment anyone has made on this list in the last 2 months.

refer back a couple of comments, you clearly have spent about a total of 
30 seconds investigating ALL THE REDHAT CLONES.

.dn

webmaster:  http://whiteboxlinux.net
and http://webdev.centos.org