[WBEL-users] WBEL Vs Centos ? :-S
Timothy Nash
tnash1@twcny.rr.com
Tue, 07 Dec 2004 12:20:33 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------030802010808030600000403
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Craig White wrote:
>On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 17:51 +0200, Raimo Koski wrote:
>
>
>
>>Update 3 based respin of Lineox has been available for free now for two
>>months. Comparable WBEL just doesn't exist yet. If you want yet faster
>>availability you can always pay to Red Hat. TANSTAAFL.
>>
>>
>>
>----
>maybe it's me but it just seems rude to frequently post recruiting
>messages here.
>
>Craig
>
>_______________________________________________
>Whitebox-users mailing list
>Whitebox-users@beau.org
>http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
>
>
>
Not only rude, but unprofessional as well...... Raimo, I hope you
realize that what you write (in these forums) is a direct reflection of
your character. While I have no problem with you promoting lineox (mind
you not over and over and over....), I do have a problem with the way in
which you bash the other clones. Your character in and of itself is
enough to make me not use Lineox, regardless of it's merits. As others
have pointed out in this forum, speedy updates is NOT the sole criterion
for choosing a cloned distro. One thing that WBEL has that the other
distros do not is THIS forum - one of the best community forums which
I've had the pleasure of being a part of.
--------------030802010808030600000403
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Craig White wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid1102436368.5195.1.camel@lin-workstation.azapple.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 17:51 +0200, Raimo Koski wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Update 3 based respin of Lineox has been available for free now for two
months. Comparable WBEL just doesn't exist yet. If you want yet faster
availability you can always pay to Red Hat. TANSTAAFL.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->----
maybe it's me but it just seems rude to frequently post recruiting
messages here.
Craig
_______________________________________________
Whitebox-users mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Whitebox-users@beau.org">Whitebox-users@beau.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users">http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
Not only rude, but unprofessional as well...... Raimo, I hope you
realize that what you write (in these forums) is a direct reflection of
your character. While I have no problem with you promoting lineox
(mind you not over and over and over....), I do have a problem with the
way in which you bash the other clones. Your character in and of
itself is enough to make me not use Lineox, regardless of it's merits.
As others have pointed out in this forum, speedy updates is NOT the
sole criterion for choosing a cloned distro. One thing that WBEL has
that the other distros do not is THIS forum - one of the best community
forums which I've had the pleasure of being a part of.<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------030802010808030600000403--