[WBEL-users] WBEL kernel slower than RH9?

Daniel T. Gynn dan.gynn@essensys.com
Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:01:06 -0500


--=-Fl03hRG9S3lyFlMKPu4d
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


When I was trying to narrow down a cause of a hardware problem I noticed
that the WBEL kernel seems slower than a RH9 kernel. =20

I ran the following test to see for sure:
dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D2gb bs=3D1024k count=3D2048

date;copy 2gb 2gb.copy1;date
date;copy 2gb 2gb.copy2;date
date;copy 2gb 2gb.copy3;date

With kernel 2.4.21-9.0.1ELsmp, the difference between the dates was
2:18, 2:23, 2:26.  With kernel 2.4.20-19.9smp, the difference between
the dates was 1:51, 1:49, 1:48.

This is on a Dual 2.8Ghz Xeon with 2GB RAM.  Nothing major is running on
the server yet to affect the times.  Does anyone have any ideas why this
is?


--=20
-----------------------
Daniel T. Gynn
RHCE #806200978201621
Essential Systems, Inc.
412-931-5403 ext. 1
fax: 412-931-5425
dan.gynn@essensys.com
GnuPG Key http://www.essensys.com/~dan/gpgring.asc
Fingerprint: 0979 73B8 847A 349E 7363  66F4 6A79 DD72 495D CD60

--=-Fl03hRG9S3lyFlMKPu4d
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBATJi+anndckldzWARAlvnAKDPHohNhqCreTU4S6VwcHEMOCs4UQCfdBKi
uhG7ne5bK84AAygcWvHj+gc=
=QNRm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-Fl03hRG9S3lyFlMKPu4d--