[WBEL-users] Love the product...

[Tony]

>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:07:50 -0800
> From: Ed <ekg@tricity.wsu.edu>
> Reply-To: ekg@tricity.wsu.edu
> To: Scott Heisler <scott.heisler@huntleighusa.com>
> CC: whitebox-users@beau.org
> Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] Love the product...
>
> X-Washington State University Tricities-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>
> Scott Heisler wrote:
> > I love Whitebox Linux.  I'm now using it on production equipment, after
> > much testing.  WBEL is very stable and the hardware support is amazing. 
> > I just installed it yesterday on a brand new dual XEON 3.0g server with
> > an LSI Megaraid Ultra 320 SCSI Controller.  Everything worked without
> > additional drivers, even the onboard Intel gigabit adapters!  Also, the
> > OS supported the hyperthreading as well!
> >
> > I do have one beef.... why does the distro not include PINE.  While I
> > don't use pine that often for e-mail (mainly for testing e-mail), I love
> > pico. It's very easy to use and has menus.  Every RH distro I've used
> > since 5.2 has included Pine. Why would WBEL not include it?
>
> IIRC, UW Pine is not at all open source software, and no-one has
> bothered to re-write it.  There is a GPL'd pico clone named nano, though.
>
> I, personally, like mutt as well if not better than pine for
> terminal-based email.  You might try it out and see if it meets your needs.
>
>    Ed
>
> > Thanks for a great product!
> >
> > Scott
> > _______________________________________________
> > Whitebox-users mailing list
> > Whitebox-users@beau.org
> > http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
>
> --__--__--


Personally i still use Joe, since i was around back when wordstar was still
big...  

I assume its gpl... ( or bsd )