[WBEL-users] Somethink like freshrpms.net for WBEL ???

[Edward Rudd]

Yes the binaries are compatible.. The only main difference is that if
the package/program looks for /etc/redhat-release it will break, so it
has to look fro /etc/whitebox-release. But there are very few packages
that do that.. Just some the core specific redhat config programs and
that's it.. I am using Dag Wieers APT repository for RHEL3 without any
problems..

On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 01:33, Petr Klima wrote:
> Yes, BUT
> 
>    I just wrote to Mathias Saou (maintainer of freshrpms.net) and it 
> look like he has no averse to make his packages for RHEL (from RH). He 
> has all the infrastructure, bandwith and mirrors ...
> 
>    The questions are:
> 1. Are RHEL packages realy so same (binary) with WBEL (without need to 
> rebuild)?
> 
> 2.Y If so, lets use/post our (s)rpm to freshrpms.net (how it will be 
> with "distributioname" in RPMs and yum/apt )
> 2.N If not, are we able to have an "intact" machine (packages just from 
> distribution and from freshrpms.net) for secure and reliable rebuilding?
> 
> 3. If so, how we will distribute souch rebuilds?
> 
> Maybe
> 
> Doug Eubanks napsal(a):
> > BTW:  Please e-mail me if you are interested in helping to maintain the site.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Doug Eubanks
> > admin@dougware.net
> > 
> > 
> >>Hello
> >>
> >>is there somethink like freshrpms.net for WBEL ??? Or I should build all
> >>non-distro packages from sources?
> >>
> >>Are there any plans to share souch work together?
> >>
> _______________________________________________
> Whitebox-users mailing list
> Whitebox-users@beau.org
> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
-- 
Edward Rudd <eddie@omegaware.com>
Website http://outoforder.cc/