[WBEL-users] Postfix or Sendmail

[steve]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 31 March 2004 01:38 pm, Milan Keršláger wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 08:17:01PM +0200, Michiel van Es wrote:
> > 
> > >>>Any feedback on the setup? Sendmail or Postfix? Pros and Cons?
> > >>
> > >>Postfix is more secure. Sendmail is big ball with big holes (at least in
> > >>the past).
> > >
> > >
> > >	It's been a while since there's been major problem with sendmail.  At
> > >this point, if I were you, I'd probably toss a coin.  If both do
> > >everything you need them to and you are equally comfortable in both pick
> > >the one you think will be easiest for a future admin to work with (like
> > >after you're retired or whatever).
> > >
> > Ik also find the "Postfix is more secure. Sendmail is big ball with big 
> > holes (at least in the past)."  very lame.
> > Please give good arguments before takin' a crack on a outstanding 
> > mailserver like Sendmail.
> > I do not say Postfix is worse..I think they have both pros and cons but 
> > I am not going to tell that Sendmail is bad and not give any good 
> > argument why it is such a bad decision.
> > If I had to choose it is Sendmail for it's simplicity and it's 
> > virtusertable function which is not 100% implemented in Postfix (imho).
> 
> I don't know what to say more. At least sendmail has a big holes in the
> past. And everytime they promised "this is the last problem".
> 
> Don't make me wrong - I'm using sendmail since 1993.
> 
> Yes - there is a lot of design changes in last (few) years but...
> The sendmail is here only because of long history. This is better to
> move to postfix now (the second mailer in RHEL, WBEL or so).
> 
god forbid you ever have anything positive to say!

why do you even monitor this list? you certianly don't contribute anything other than bad karma.
GO AWAY!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQIVAwUBQGsmO1KIfa6KkPmeAQLulRAA1ED6r5p2+UTyHC3m3WG/Y3TzGe5zHK9C
9D9TSuYM+JRyXQkF/fTp1KwqshYjiffEQh3i4uZZDyTEN5n2600ITSbyuwN3QtUE
oFsYcleUuomqVNsuGLg3dGuUAW0gBbBFospIpPEz/YipSM+rL8Z5Owj/GSLH1NZh
kG5OxxpNRa9VpzHXBJznmyDqU6ORXJfBkbQmLZIpeqMbkZOMh+oeQ4F5BUpTcbb2
iL8rkuHgFF3DbzQAkrdekcmt1zUuCJJIOXfGP6NPGETOiz1We+4E1wdvr6Cudgia
JxzhCVmjWbg0BA/Fs8r3glcJf1smiNU8SSjig1wjiURSkUiGyf7G0i+v7vY/05wB
lCud6x+sVmZUdRvtsHY8GVVg+MF3s9IVzTELHF3OOKnzCht6zkCHXQ1vrPxtL0o4
6zRbszd/gUe8aTPl8xne6EdC1JiuuOW2IXy9fSpyUXOB3gmqxN5nRQH5mcf2UeYd
C72oeop+z3tioOYXJc6T1dQkMZhGBYxGaGKylZBhAqEv51+oeLJIwu6AZRgA8IrK
1iOvtHYFrUHKA3y8P0oMWzeKnHpOLwMAplENboYWMEFnOcYHfImHkRPTG3Qxwgvm
CeGgxM+smoMZwOweyVCeTDmqdQRyHgD3Gc4I9o8cvvEu1+zvMaCgT53YFeMl1FdQ
p4+7BmCf67Y=
=cmhP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----