[WBEL-users] question on Automount
William Hooper
whooperhsd2@earthlink.net
Sat, 15 May 2004 10:54:11 -0400 (EDT)
Loyd said:
> I'm having trouble with my new White Box install. I'm trying to get two
> fat32 volumes to mount so I can share them via SMB.
> They won't mount automatically, like in other distributions so I did some
> research and found out I can use /etc/fstab or Automount, which is also
> called Autofs?. Is that right?
> I read that the fstab option is a drain on system resources so I decided
> to go the Automount route. Upon reading further however It seems to me
> that Automount is for removable media. I don't need a timeout option to
> mount a filesystem on a HDD, right?
I'm not sure where you read that putting a mount in fstab is "a drain on
system resources". It sounds like you want the partitions mounted at boot
and always mounted. That is a job for fstab.
If, however, you wanted the drives mounted on demand (say for example an
nfs mount, or mounting a smbfs share from another server), then autofs
might be what you want.
--
William Hooper