[WBEL-users] Preparing Security Updates
Milan Ker¹lįger
milan.kerslager@pslib.cz
Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:10:21 +0200
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:30:47PM -0500, John Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Milan [iso-8859-2] Ker?lįger wrote:
>
> > I really don't underestand why they are on CD but in another directory.
> > Maybe to make a pain to users because there is no reason to do this as
> > another non-RH-published packages are in the tree (*devel* packages,
> > MySQL, PostgreSQL server and so on...).
>
> Not actually having seen a shipping copy of RHEL3 when putting the first
> WBEL set together the only rules I could use were the following:
>
> The SRPMS on ftp.redhat.com are considered canon. (up2date and yum being
> the exceptions)
As I told - this is only pain and inconsitence because there is no MySQL
in RH's SRPMS for example. There is *no* real reason.
> Anything which issued from those packages was included in WBEL. RedHat
> themselves omitted some of the -devel packages but a) I had no way to know
> which ones and b) I thought that was dumb, especially for a rebuild
> intended for Open Source/Free Software types instead of Support Contract
> Security Blanket types. FOSS types type "configure ; make install"
> without even thinking about it.
>
> Anything needed to build the official packages are lostRPMS and lostSRPMS.
> Those packages are only included to allow rebuilding with the same
> versions used in my rebuild. They should really only be used in that
> context since none of the completed binaries need any of them and most are
> deprecated. But I know I use lynx on a regular basis.
--
Milan Kerslager
E-mail: milan.kerslager@pslib.cz
WWW: http://www.pslib.cz/ke/