[WBEL-users] RHEL

[Conor Wynne]

--=-4xuxr740IGXFcr3e99rN
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 23:45, Ganeshram Iyer wrote:
> Hello all,
> Had a quick question. I have been using WBEL for the last few months and=20
> have been totally satisfied but now have an option to move to RHEL. The=20
> WBEL that we get is the ES version (at least thats what mine says). The=20
> options with RHEL that I have are only WS or AS. Which would be the=20
> better option to go with. WS is intended to be a desktop while the AS is=20
> a top-of-the-line-server according to redhat.com description. My need is=20
> only for a domain with about 15 machines and as many users. Is WS=20
> intended for this. Would AS be overkill?=20

Yes, complete overkill. How many processors do you have? How much RAM
(over 4GB?) Will you be clustering? etc

> Could AS be used as a desktop=20
> also with little trouble? I see a lot of package differences but dont=20
> know if there are other differences that would help me make my mind up=20
> (and soon)

Dont use it as a desktop, go for something else like mandrake. I use
both mandrake 10 (Wife's box) and SUN JDS2 (on my own one).


--=20
Conor Wynne
Dublin
Irlande

--=-4xuxr740IGXFcr3e99rN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBBeisRTlURc8L++sIRArzdAKCXFVMualQLDdpDOnLJzCiPD+dauwCbBkQS
VUwbpNY/veBM4bl223OTwzI=
=Qu4v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-4xuxr740IGXFcr3e99rN--