[WBEL-users] Replacement for imapd?

Craig White craigwhite at azapple.com
Wed Apr 6 00:07:54 CDT 2005

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 20:21 -0700, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> I'm using sendmail/Imapd as configured by default so that email resides on the 
> server and is backed up. 
> However, we're heavy email users, and parsing a 100 MB mail spool file is 
> starting to whale the tar out of our itty bitty mail server. 
> What recommendations do you have to replace the default imapd for imap 
> support? Something with better performance, decent compatability, and that 
> doesn't stop me from backing up email easily to tape or disk2disk.... 

incredible - fast - efficient



More information about the Whitebox-users mailing list