[WBEL-users] Replacement for imapd?
craigwhite at azapple.com
Wed Apr 6 00:07:54 CDT 2005
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 20:21 -0700, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> I'm using sendmail/Imapd as configured by default so that email resides on the
> server and is backed up.
> However, we're heavy email users, and parsing a 100 MB mail spool file is
> starting to whale the tar out of our itty bitty mail server.
> What recommendations do you have to replace the default imapd for imap
> support? Something with better performance, decent compatability, and that
> doesn't stop me from backing up email easily to tape or disk2disk....
incredible - fast - efficient
More information about the Whitebox-users