[WBEL-users] Production Ready?
Richard Crawford
rcrawford at unexmail.ucdavis.edu
Fri Apr 29 10:37:10 CDT 2005
Please forgive my newbie intrusion.
In our office, we're currently running a Fedora Core 2 server to host some
internal testbed sites. I'm not particularly happy with running FC2 and I
desperately want to upgrade. I use FC3 on my desktop computers and on my
home server; however, even though I've never experienced stability problems
with Fedora, the rapid release cycle makes me want something a little less
volatile. On the recommendation of some folks at the California EPA, I'm
considering WBEL.
My question is this: Would WBEL 4 rc1 be appropriate for us? Or should I
stick with 3 resp 2? The system would be used primarily for website
development, so would need Apache/PHP/MySQL; it also needs to have Samba,
SSH, and Subversion available.
--
Richard S. Crawford
Programmer III
UC Davis Extension Distance Education Group
2901 K Street
Sacramento, CA 95816
(916)327-7793
http://unexdlc.ucdavis.edu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/attachments/20050429/6a717369/attachment.bin
More information about the Whitebox-users
mailing list