[WBEL-users] RH 9.0 to Whitebox 3.0?
Phil Schaffner
Philip.R.Schaffner@NASA.gov
Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:46:47 -0400
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 11:49, Milan Ker¹lįger wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:30:29PM -0500, Michael Cozzi wrote:
> > Thanks in advance for your comments.
> >
> > I've got three servers that have been in production since RedHat 7.0.
> > All of them have been upgraded through apt-get to version 9.0- with no
> > problems, and in fact remotely. There were some config conflicts that had
> > to be resolved, but basically, it was a no problem deal.
> >
> > I need to migrate these servers, hopefully, without a complete
> > rebuild.
> >
> > What is the current package compatibility between RH9 and Whitebox
> > 3.0?
>
> RHEL3 is something between RH9 and Fedora Core 1.
>
> > It it possible to just yum the box to the current release? It worked
> > between full releases on RedHat, and I need an easy way out.
>
> Possibly will yum work. But RH's people never tested this upgrade so you
> have been warned :-)
If you decide to try it, you may find some useful information here:
http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/2004-February/000527.html
and a slight correction
http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/2004-February/000545.html
Phil