[WBEL-users] KRB5 rpms

[bishop]

Rex,

So, like, similar to openssl and glibc with respect to compat-libs 
kicking around on a server?

That doesn't sound like a massive project, and if I had the free time 
I'd be off rolling something. (he says, wasting time)

  - bish

Rex Dieter wrote:

> IMO, blindly upgrading would suck more, as it would require *every* 
> application that uses krb5 to be rebuilt/recompiled (since
> libcom_err.so.3 seems to be deprecated in the new version).
> 
> 
> Now, if things could be arranged so that both krb5-libs-1.2.x and 
> krb5-libs-1.3.x could be installed along-side one-another, that's a 
> possibility.
> 
> -- Rex
> 
> Roy Vestal wrote:
> 
>> That would suck. I have a couple of clusters that I don't want to have 
>> to upgrade just to get the authentication from AD.
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rex Dieter" <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
>> To: <whitebox-users@beau.org>
>> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 10:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] KRB5 rpms
>>
>>
>>> Roy Vestal wrote:
>>>
>>>> Has anyone heard of when KRB5 libraries going to 1.3.x?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> RHEL4 will certainly have it.  I doubt it'll ever be officially 
>>> provided for RHEL3.
>>>
>>> -- Rex
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Whitebox-users mailing list
>>> Whitebox-users@beau.org
>>> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Whitebox-users mailing list
>> Whitebox-users@beau.org
>> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Whitebox-users mailing list
> Whitebox-users@beau.org
> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users

-- 
	"What do you call the smaller ones;
	 Cabinet-Maker Ants?"  -- Kevin