[WBEL-users] Re: wbel-u] Availability of WBEL 4?
Lance Davis
lance at uklinux.net
Mon Feb 21 05:53:41 CST 2005
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Robert Kropiewnicki wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 02:00:55 +0000 (GMT), Lance Davis <lance at uklinux.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Raimo Koski wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > Raimo,
> > > >
> > > > how the ---- does that belong on the WBEL list?
> > > >
> > > > The initial reply seemed fine ... someone was asking about wbel4 ... and
> > > > someone said, hey, there is a centos 4 if you want to try it. So far,
> > > > nothing wrong.
> > >
> > > So it is ok for centos developers (Karanbir Singh, donavan nelson, and
> > > you) and business partners (Lance Davis, uklinux.net) to promote centos
> > > here.
> >
> > and what makes you differentiate me as a business partner :)
> >
> > I am in fact one of the lead developers and the original founder of
> > CentOS.
> >
> > Lance
> > --
>
> Lance,
>
> While I applaud the hard work and effort of the CentOS team, I also
> question whether it is proper for the CentOS team to spend so much
> time promoting their distribution on the Whitebox mailing list.
I was not 'promoting our distribution' merely correcting a point of fact
that was misreported.
Lance
--
uklinux.net -
The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.
More information about the Whitebox-users
mailing list