grahamp at wsieurope.com
Fri Jul 1 03:47:05 CDT 2005
I think its so packages which depend on there being a redhat-release
From: whitebox-users-bounces at beau.org
[mailto:whitebox-users-bounces at beau.org] On Behalf Of Thomas E Dukes
Sent: 01 July 2005 02:43
To: 'William Hooper'; whitebox-users at beau.org
Subject: RE: [WBEL-users] updates
> -----Original Message-----
> From: whitebox-users-bounces at beau.org
> [mailto:whitebox-users-bounces at beau.org] On Behalf Of William Hooper
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 9:25 AM
> To: whitebox-users at beau.org
> Subject: RE: [WBEL-users] updates
> Thomas E Dukes wrote:
> >>> Instead of yum looking for '2' as the $releasever as previously
> >>> posted, now that I have removed the fedora-release .rpm, it now
> >>> indicates 'Null' as the release version.
> >> whitebox-release
> > Hello,
> > Yes, it is already installed.
> Since whitebox-release doesn't provide redhat-release, you
> have to edit the yum.conf file and change distroverpkg.
If I'm not mistakened, the whitebox-release .rpm contains the
/etc/redhat-release file. I thought was starnge but maybe necessary.
> William Hooper
> Whitebox-users mailing list
> Whitebox-users at beau.org
Whitebox-users mailing list
Whitebox-users at beau.org
More information about the Whitebox-users