[WBEL-users] Re: About the Updates for Whiteboxlinux (part II)

[khaqq]

Good point. I have a question, though.
Was a "thank you" too difficult to add ? 

Gee.

GPL => no warranty, be happy it was there in the first place.

khaqq


On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 11:07:12 +1300
Tony Wicks <tonyw at tonyw.com> wrote:

> Let's not beat about the bush here. Due to the structure of Whitebox 
> (ie, one person doing the lot and not being interested in anybody else 
> helping, despite lots of offers), it really should not be used by anyone 
> but BEAU. John releasing the project to the public, but refusing help 
> effectively makes it a dead duck. I moved all my Whitebox machines to 
> Centos a long time ago and have not looked back. I'm out of here, and 
> I'm sorry to say I'm taking my mirror server (ftp.wicks.co.nz) with me.
> 
> 
> 
> Greg Knaddison wrote:
> 
> >The updates have been slow for a while and with the Hurricanes passing
> >near the WBEL "team" (of one) and displacing lots of people the
> >updates have quite reasonably slowed further.
> >
> >There are a variety of updates that have been released from RH but not
> >rebuilt by WBEL.  Depending on the purpose of your box and it's
> >location (behind a firewall, as a firewall, as a desktop) these may or
> >may not be important to you.
> >Regards,
> >Greg
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Whitebox-users mailing list
> >Whitebox-users at beau.org
> >http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Whitebox-users mailing list
> Whitebox-users at beau.org
> http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
>